• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Financial Compensation

Show me someone that has said they turn their nose up at 100.00 per gig. I know I have not. That is pretty normal and normally what is see. I do get a little more doing sit-in/sub work at a few churches I play at.

I just think most understand that 100.00 a night ain't nothing to brag about.

It's relative, and I agree it's nothing to brag about. However, there are many other blues/rock bar bands that are jealous because they don't draw like us and are doing gigs 4 hour gigs for $250.00.

blue
 
I consider the drive to be part of the gig time. I won't accept a $100 gig if it is too far from home. I need more for my time and gas.

For me, the gig time starts when I start to load up the truck and ends when I am done unloading. So an average "4 hour gig" is 8+ hours of my time.

So for an average $100 gig I make about $12.50 an hour... just above minimum wage.
 
I consider the drive to be part of the gig time. I won't accept a $100 gig if it is too far from home. I need more for my time and gas.

For me, the gig time starts when I start to load up the truck and ends when I am done unloading. So an average "4 hour gig" is 8+ hours of my time.

So for an average $100 gig I make about $12.50 an hour... just above minimum wage.

:hyper:
 
Just TB'ers trying to be "elite". That's what prompted me to start the "I will NOT play if...." thread.



You make $100. a night in the front of the house playing music whereas at the exact same time you are on stage,
that dishwasher in the back of the house making minimum wage would trade you in a minute!

I remember $70./day carrying bundles of shingles up a ladder stocking roofs. That was some major suckage!

$100. a day for essentially a part time job ain't that bad!

Except the dishwasher and shingle lugger can work 5+ days per week and thus make a living wage. Amongst my friends, if you want to make a living wage 5+ days a week as a musician, you need to spend at least four days a week teaching lessons. For some this is fine, others tire of showing 7 year olds how to "mangle a C chord" day after day.

I agree that real pros don't post in threads like this. That's part of the professionalism that makes them a pro.
 
. Do you have per man dollar minimum for booking shows, if yes, is it acceptable to you?

Not any more...a few years ago, yes but bad economy has resulted in fewer gigs with guarantees. Now we negotiate the minimum on a gig by gig basis depending on travel and other factors.

. Are you paid or does your money go into a band fund? If your share of gig money or a portion of it goes to a band fund, are you ok with it?

No band fund for my current bands. Have had them in the past, though. I have to admit that every time there has been a band fund I have lost some of my contribution.

. If your paid is it an equal split?

In most cases yes. One band, no. Another band, I get extra if I am providing PA.

. Are you paid in cash after every show. Or paid whenever someone finds the time. If yes, are you ok with it?

Cash or check at end of show. Once in a while the check is mailed, not often.

. Do you have to chase your money down from a BL or other band member?

I did it once this year, first time in many years.

. Do you have a payroll and your paid by check on a weekly or monthly basis?

No
 
I just said it, because it's the issue that makes the dishwasher comparison invalid. The dishwasher does *not* want to be on-stage because it would not earn him a living wage. You would need to compare part-time musician to comparable part-time jobs, like maybe a clown for kids parties. I think those clowns and princesses make more money than most bar band musicians. The clown probably puts some time into learning how to tie balloon animals, but I'm not sure it compares to the time required to learn to play an instrument, rehearse, etc.
 
I consider the drive to be part of the gig time. I won't accept a $100 gig if it is too far from home. I need more for my time and gas.

For me, the gig time starts when I start to load up the truck and ends when I am done unloading. So an average "4 hour gig" is 8+ hours of my time.

So for an average $100 gig I make about $12.50 an hour... just above minimum wage.



Dude! Where do you live?:eek:
Federal minimum wage in the united states is $7.25/hr.......way way less than 12.50 !
Hell, that's more than I make working as a skilled tradesman for the state of florida.
Lol:D
 
fdeck said:
I'd say if you're playing for $100 or less, with extensive gear investment and setup time, then it's time to stop bagging on people who play for free.

I think theres a big difference between playing for free and playing for $100.00.

However, I don't think ripping on anyone who plays for free is right either. If you like playing for free play for free, but don't include me.

Daryl
 
I think theres a big difference between playing for free and playing for $100.00.

However, I don't think ripping on anyone who plays for free is right either. If you like playing for free play for free, but don't include me.

Daryl

Where would you draw the line, where a gig pays so little that it's tantamount to playing for free? Would you take 50 bucks if it involved virtually zero overhead?

We all have our limits.
 
Where would you draw the line, where a gig pays so little that it's tantamount to playing for free? Would you take 50 bucks if it involved virtually zero overhead?

We all have our limits.

The whole overhead thing I think makes sense in some circumstances. I get to a show, and and my rig is set up in about 15 minutes, tearing it down the same. I just don't factor that time or gas. I guess I'm not a good business person.

There might be several extenuating circumstances where I would play for 50.00. However it would not involve playing for 4 hours.

blue
 
I'd say if you're playing for $100 or less, with extensive gear investment and setup time, then it's time to stop bagging on people who play for free.

At least $100 pays for all your immediate expenses (gas, beer if not free, etc.) :p

I consider music a hobby. Compared to what I make at my "real job", the money I make playing bass is a joke. But how many hobbies actually pay for themselves? Or at least *can* pay for themselves?
 
The whole overhead thing I think makes sense in some circumstances. I get to a show, and and my rig is set up in about 15 minutes, tearing it down the same. I just don't factor that time or gas. I guess I'm not a good business person.

There might be several extenuating circumstances where I would play for 50.00. However it would not involve playing for 4 hours.

blue

On the contrary, it sounds like you've done a good job of managing your overhead, if you can get in and out in 15 min.

To be fair, I haven't played in a rock band, in 30 years. When I read about the amount of time, gear, and travel involved in operating a bar band, for the pay that it involves, my impression is that it doesn't make business sense, but that it might be a lot of fun for someone who has the time to spare. A band that's good enough to make business sense is probably good enough to hire a better bassist than me.

So, it looks to me like folks are engaging in an activity, that they enjoy, but that doesn't make business sense. It's not that you're a good or bad business person, but that the entire bar band scene is just not much of a business proposition. And that's OK.

I play in a civic band. We play a monthly gig, with all proceeds going to the band fund for buying more charts and taking care of minor expenses. On the other hand, almost everybody in the band is a formally trained musician, we've all played professionally, so we know how a pro band is run, and we run it that way. The caliber of the musicians, the level of material that we play, and the efficient use of our time, make it a worthwhile hobby, even for a number of members who would never play for free in any other situation. The chops that I've developed in that band are what make it possible for me to hang with the bands that offer me paid gigs.

I also do a fair amount of freelance work which I don't do for free. And I agree that it's a great hobby that pays for itself.
 
The whole overhead thing I think makes sense in some circumstances. I get to a show, and and my rig is set up in about 15 minutes, tearing it down the same. I just don't factor that time or gas. I guess I'm not a good business person.

There might be several extenuating circumstances where I would play for 50.00. However it would not involve playing for 4 hours.

blue

So don't you have to help move/setup PA gear? If you played in my band and didn't help with the load in and out of the PA and lighting you would not be getting an equal cut for long.