Well, since you continue this ongoing trashing of Dunlops, I’ll point out that you yourself said that you barely even tried them. By your own admission, I don’t consider that opinion “well-informed”. Like most flatwounds, Dunlops do mellow quickly and thoroughly, and they last a long time. I’m done on this topic now. …outtahere…
I was so underwhelmed after having read all the super positive comments here that after a hour I realised that they were either based on a bad assessment of the strings’ properties or I got a bad sample; however I bought two packs; I opened the second and it looked and felt exactly as the first one.
Very angry for having wasted 100€ (in Europe they are more expensive than in the USA) I took them off and established that they were bad strings for me as I don’t like very stiff strings and they have to sound vintage as flatwound strings.
That’s why when I hear again people stating that the Dunlops aren’t stiff I think that their vision is somehow obfuscated and I feel the urge to tell what I believe is true (at least they are not so flexible to allow them
to be compared to TI, Rotos or Pyramid and this has to be said objectively - for example the LaBella LTF 4-A, so called flexible flats, are not that flexible IME and it should be objectively stated, although they sound very nice, the opposite of the Dunlops).
Then we have the “Dunlops pasdarans” that get hot for nothing and the thread becomes a bashing this, bashing that one .. bah .. the OP will do what he/she wants and what he/she likes with his/her money but he/she should listen to people with different experiences in order to make an informed choice; mine with Dunlops is this and I’ll never spend another cent for them unless they change the 45-105 model specs.
A couple of thing is great with them however: 1. They are very smooth, 2. The plastic wax covering the silk at both ends preserving it from unravelling.
Tone and stiffness-wise however the OP can find much, much better, especially if he/she likes playing Motown’s soul