• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Formal musical education or self taught?

Formal musical education or self taught?

  • Formal Education (i.e. lessons, school, etc)

    Votes: 58 40.6%
  • Self taught

    Votes: 97 67.8%
  • Mentor

    Votes: 9 6.3%

  • Total voters
    143
I was just wondering what percentage of the guys here have had some sort of formal musical education (i.e. lessons, school, etc.) as apposed to the percentage of self taught players.


Edit: If you have both a formal education and something else vote as formal education.
 
i didnt choose any off them. i have training, but not on bass. 8 years of formal training on clarinet, bass clarinet, & percussion. self taught on bass & guitar. i think formal training in the basics of music is very important. but i see no problem with being self taught on a specific instrument.
 
I've been in concert/marching/jazz band since the 5th grade playing euphonium/trombone. I didn't pick up the bass though until my senior year in the aptly named "learn an instrument" class. My teacher never got us out of the first book though, so I learned what frets on which string are which note but as for my actual playing technique it's mostly self taught/watching videos on youtube/mimicking what my friend does when he plays bass
 
I chose "formal education" because while being largely self-taught on bass, I started piano at age 4 and took lessons all the way through high school. I played sax for a lot of years as well (concert/symphonic/jazz bands like Walrus), until I toured for a year with Up With People and picked up a bass for the first time at a cast party. Found my true passion and have been playing for about 13 1/2 years.

Transferring scales & theory to bass was pretty easy for me and I didn't take lessons until the last year or so, when I've taken lessons with Ray Riendeau, a couple drum and groove clinics and most recently, a bass clinic with Doug Johns.

I also share Change-jug's philosophy... no matter how much you know or how long you've played, there's always something to learn or something to brush up on! :bassist:

5sg.
 
Well, I had formal piano lessons for 5 years. Then I had formal double bass (orchestral) training for about 10 years. During the 10 years of playing in orchestras and chamber groups, I taught myself to play the electric bass, the guitar, and the mandolin. I started playing upright bass in jazz and bluegrass settings without any "formal" training, and I play electric in just about any genre where they'll take me.

So, both?
 
The day I had a bass for the first time I had lesson. I took them for 4 years before I went to college on classical DB and jazz BG. that for 3 years. After I took one year of private lesson and since then it has been 4 years selftaught
 
There should be a "both" option...

+1. I did ok as a teenager on several instruments, with only some piano lessons as an intro to the written note.

Music college activated a different musical side of me. But it didn't give me my basic understanding of harmony and melody; it just developed what I had already found by myself.

Imho, basic musical understanding comes from your enthusiasm and curiosity: i.e., wanting to experiment with your instrument.

Structured teaching attempts to shepherd us towards milestones of competency, which is great.
But it can't replace the intuitive, physical connection we get when we're constantly driven to mess with our instrument.