Looks just like a Telefunken U47
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
AFAIK he never needed permission to play the music.Does this mean Dweezil needs to ask UMG when he wants to perform his dad's music?
I see what you did there….I’m surprised the kids were in agreement; there had been some squabbling over some similar matters. I guess they’re only in it for the money.
Only once a week?
You should be saying it more.
Even if they wanted to, where would they begin???
It’s always the right move. Some of the lyric references land but the film references are tough. You know when someone gets it the rest of the conversation is off the rails in a good way.Yep, i’m prone to interject…
“Oh... You were the girl that was stuck to seat 38 on Phydeaux iii...”
but it’s a kneejerk thing that may or may not be related to the conversational thread into which it is dropped. About the only thing it reliably does is expose fellow Zappa geeks. While not a dyed in the wool Frank-o-phile I am deep enough into that rabbit hole I crave a pygmy pony and a real poncho.
This is my thought, too. If ownership of copyright was a problem in this way, there would be no cover bands playing music anywhere. I don't think you need permission to perform a song live, and the issues with Dweezil's band had more to do with the family drawing a line around who could use the Zappa name.why would it? can't anyone perform such music in a licensed venue?
AFAIK he never needed permission to play the music.
The fights were about:
• Trademarks. E.g. Ahmet objected to Dweezil using the phrase "Zappa Plays Zappa" for his tour, so Dweezil renamed it the "Dweezil Zappa Plays Whatever The F@!# He Wants" tour.
• Merch. Frank-themed merch has to be licensed by the family trust, Dweezil claimed he wasn't being paid or something, and during the dispute stopped selling Frank swag at shows. Ahmet was apparently mad about Dweezil not selling Frank swag.
It doesn't help that the trust is allegedly in debt, and that almost everyone has badmouthed everyone else in public for years. The family struck a deal a few years ago which ended at least the public part of the feud.
As to UMG, the family has worked with them for years on reissues and streaming. UMG likely made them an offer that only a Dancin' Fool would pass up.
Noted, with appreciation.Universal Studios is not affiliated with Universal Music Group
FZ pulled performance licenses for his music some time in the late 70's(?). That made public performance without permission illegal under copyright law.why would it? can't anyone perform such music in a licensed venue?
Arite then…It’s always the right move. Some of the lyric references land but the film references are tough. You know when someone gets it the rest of the conversation is off the rails in a good way.
Read the article? By that time, they had severed most ties, but UMG was still "a rent-paying tenant on NBC Universal’s lot". That is, the music archive was inside the Studio area; which is precisely why the fire determined the loss of all that music.Noted, with appreciation.Universal Studios is not affiliated with Universal Music GroupI hope their storage protocols have improved since '08:
Invalid Link Removed
I respectfully refer you to post #51, above.Read the article? By that time, they had severed most ties, but UMG was still "a rent-paying tenant on NBC Universal’s lot". That is, the music archive was inside the Studio area; which is precisely why the fire determined the loss of all that music.
(But no, I don't think they still keep their masters/servers there either.)
And I to the very article you linked to.I respectfully refer you to post #51, above.
Arite then…
“He made me do it Dave. he’s such a creep. he’s making me hold his aladdin.”