TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
Free jazz and free improvisation is all about structure. Pre-composed music and straight ahead jazz is about playing - you bring a structure so you don't have to make one.For me, anyway, the lack of structure in some types of free jazz can become a type of structure itself.
I guess I should have inserted the word “pre-conceived” before “structure.”Free jazz and free improvisation is all about structure. Pre-composed music and straight ahead jazz is about playing - you bring a structure so you don't have to make one.
Free jazz and free improvisation is all about structure. Pre-composed music and straight ahead jazz is about playing - you bring a structure so you don't have to make one.
This concept is one I struggle with because the Ornette Coleman stuff I’ve listened to appears to have very little structure - and thus it turns me off completely. “Everybody solo!” and such. I have a lot of trouble finding any structure whatsoever in much of the free jazz/improvised music I’ve attempted to listen to; of course I am untrained with no formal musical education (just the stuff I’ve worked on at home since my lessons never started because of Covid), but I know what sounds good to me. I’m definitely digging in to these suggestions of artists to check out on my Apple Music and much of it is very good.
I understand the sheer expression of the art form though. Improvised music seems to be completely about indulging the musicians so I can see why so many want to play it.
Ornette's concept, especially the early work is called "Harmolodics", the basic idea being the structure & harmony follows the melodies which modulate.
"Everybody solo" which is not what is going on exactly, would still be a structure. Any piece of music that ends has a structure that happened. If you are looking for a chord structure, you won't find one - that is specifically avoided. The meeting points are different, but something still gets it from beginning to end!
Jimmy Giuffre's Freefall might also be a way in.
Of all the Giuffre LPs with that lineup (Paul Bley, Steve Swallow) that one is the most out. But it is a great album, the CD has a bunch of tracks (mostly solo clarinet) that were left off the LP.How important is body language with free jazz and improvised music?
Meaning, is there no visual component among artists, using all ear and mind, or is there a lot of eye contact, gesture and visual queuing? How is the line between these typically drawn?
More like a black hole!!!!Of all the Giuffre LPs with that lineup (Paul Bley, Steve Swallow) that one is the most out. But it is a great album, the CD has a bunch of tracks (mostly solo clarinet) that were left off the LP.
The Verve sides, reissued on ECM as "1961" is a better starting point for that band and is readily available. If you like that, then try "Freefall".
The two HatHut issues of radio concerts during a German tour are also excellent, as are the "reunion" recordings made in the 80s and 90s for Owl and Soul Note.
More like a black hole!!!!Of all the Giuffre LPs with that lineup (Paul Bley, Steve Swallow) that one is the most out. But it is a great album, the CD has a bunch of tracks (mostly solo clarinet) that were left off the LP.
I understand the sheer expression of the art form though. Improvised music seems to be completely about indulging the musicians so I can see why so many want to play it.
It's been my experience that some play it as it can be easier to "fake into" when they are not that accomplished on their instruments, musically and technically.
Mingus would apparently agree with this sentiment.