You know, I have to throw my hat in the ring here. I'm just about TIRED of all the Fender flaming over companies that they buy and then either absorb into Fender or do away with altogether. One thing you guys need to keep in mind is that Fender can't BUY if nobody is SELLING. "Jeff" (I am assuming that is the owner/originator of GB) had to SELL the dang company for somebody to BUY it. So if he is so AMAZING when it comes to being all about his customers, why did he sell to the "evil corporate giant machine" that you people claim Fender is?
BTW, I don't blame the guy. If Fender came to me and said, "Hey. I'll buy your company for a metric ton of hundred dollar bills AND you can come work for us for a pretty good paycheck too" I would tell any customer of mine who didn't like it that they could eat poo. I gotta do what's best for me and mine.
The point is, you guys act as though Fender is some sort of "bass guy" here. They are just doing business AS ARE THE GUYS AT GB. BOTH sides are/were trying to make a dollar. Jeff is looking out for Jeff (as he should).
A little off topic, but if Hamer and Tacoma (or any of the other instruments you guys are always pissing and moaning about not being available any more) had SOLD well enough they would still be in production. Period. Fender would not have shut those companies down if their products had enough market share to keep them around. To a certain extent, either that is the case with GB, or the guys who owned GB got offered big dough and they TOOK IT. So, if there is a "bad guy" (and I don't believe there is) then is it your buddy Jeff. He sold you out if anyone did. (And, again, I don't think anyone did.)
Sorry. Had to get that off my chest. There are TWO sides of the GB/Fender bargain. BOTH had to agree to the deal.