I love my Streamliner 900 as is. However, if I feel the need to change it up in future, maybe the Broughton HPF or similar might be worth checking out.
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
I'd try that, Howie. My only issue with the Streamliner was taming the low end. The thing is a beast!I love my Streamliner 900 as is. However, if I feel the need to change it up in future, maybe the Broughton HPF or similar might be worth checking out.
The Mesa 800D is a beast as well and I use its on-board HPF constantly. You should definitely use one with the GB 900.I'd try that, Howie. My only issue with the Streamliner was taming the low end. The thing is a beast!
That's what I love about it! It turns any bass into a low end monster! Brutal!! Love it.I'd try that, Howie. My only issue with the Streamliner was taming the low end. The thing is a beast!
Sound advice right there. I was just browsing online. Thanks Pep.The Mesa 800D is a beast as well and I use its on-board HPF constantly. You should definitely use one with the GB 900.
There are similarities for sure, the Streamliner was going for a similar vintage vibe but there are very significant architectural and tone differences too, including the eq which is a completely different topology.I was actually playing with my Streamliner and Bass800D a while ago. They actually sounded pretty similar-ish since I go for a specific sound and both of them get although in different ways.
View attachment 7401410
Of course, I get it. One has a Modified Baxandall tone stack and the other a Fender tone stack. One has three tubes and the other has one. One has an adjustable HPF and deep and bright switches while the other has a selectable mid knob among probably many other things.There are similarities for sure, the Streamliner was going for a similar vintage vibe but there are very significant architectural and tone differences too, including the eq which is a completely different topology.
Well said!That's what I love about it! It turns any bass into a low end monster! Brutal!! Love it.
But I've found settings on it that allow me to tame it well enough with my active Warwicks and even my p-bass (with a treble bleed) to get some good tonal variety.
If I was to compare it to a pork sandwich, the Streamliner is the pork and the others are whatever else is in the sandwich![]()
Any updates? Did you end up trying it at rehearsal or A/Bing it with any current amps with onboard HPF or switch like the Kinetix? Thanks.I recently picked up a Mesa WD-800, and the HPF on the Mesa played a big part in giving me best-ever results in two rehearsals in rooms that have consistently been problematic.
Then last week I was reading the Streamliner tube-rolling thread, and came across this post:
“...the Streamliner was designed intentionally as a voiced amp that went after a very specific tone profile.
I regret (in a way) that there wasn't the incentive to include a variable HPF in this amp, as it probably would have a lot of value to the average player...” - @agedhorse
If Andy's opinion is that an HPF would benefit the Streamliner, I wanted to hear an HPF with mine - so I ordered a Broughton HPF.
Simply put, when I tested the HPF with my Streamliner, it was the first time I was able to get a usable tone when boosting the amp's bass EQ.
Mind you, the amp has always sounded great, but it was really interesting how much more control that simple HPF gave me.
With the HPF set in the 60-80Hz region, I could dial the amp's Bass knob past noon, which thickened the tone of the "skinny strings" - while also leaving me with a lot more discretion about how to use the midrange controls to shape that frequency band, rather than just using them as a correction to rein things in.
I'll be interested to try the HPF+Streamliner at rehearsal tomorrow:
The amp is currently for sale, but based on how it sounds with the HPF, I might reconsider selling!
I was able to A/B extensively against my WD-800.Any updates? Did you end up trying it at rehearsal or A/Bing it with any current amps with onboard HPF or switch like the Kinetix? Thanks.
Do keep us updated. Funny this thread started to speak about hpf pedals. I’ve been looking at a hpf& lpf for my genzler Magellan 350 combo to put on my pedalboard.Well, I just found a Broughton HPF for sale on TB and bought it.
For someone who loves the Streamliner voicing (and after trying more modern amps with on board HPF's and finding they make a huge difference) I'm really thinking the HPF with the Streamliner will be the "icing on the cake".
I'll update once I have it.![]()
The Genzler RE/Q (HPF/LPF + 5 band EQ) was designed to compliment the Magellan amps.Do keep us updated. Funny this thread started to speak about hpf pedals. I’ve been looking at a hpf& lpf for my genzler Magellan 350 combo to put on my pedalboard.
Hey Andy, I actually looked into that exact pedal. If genzler don’t introduce another over drive pedal I’m getting the 4 on the floor pedal. The RE/Q you designed Is just a tad too big for my pedalboard I’m building. I made a mockup to check if everything fits.The Genzler RE/Q (HPF/LPF + 5 band EQ) was designed to compliment the Magellan amps.
It had to be a little larger than we preferred so that the knobs and switches were easier to see and use. This applies to all of the pedals in the line.Hey Andy, I actually looked into that exact pedal. If genzler don’t introduce another over drive pedal I’m getting the 4 on the floor pedal. The RE/Q you designed Is just a tad too big for my pedalboard I’m building. I made a mockup to check if everything fits.
Interesting. I prefer the Streamliner over the Shuttle myself and found trying to get the Shuttle to sound like the Streamliner was not impossible, but even after getting it reasonably close, it still never gave me the heft the Streamliner has that i love about it.I was able to A/B extensively against my WD-800.
Both sounded great, but the WD-800 was just more flexible & intuitive to adjust.
But, in a twist, I eventually ended up selling both and buying a Shuttle 9.0.
Then I heard two bands in one weekend & both bassists sounded great…through Streamliners.
So I bought ANOTHER Streamliner & did a bunch of comparing with the Shuttle. I was able to get the Shuttle VERY close to the Streamliner, but not vice-versa.
And the Shuttle was much more straightforward to EQ.
I’m not currently in a band, so I have my Shuttle in the classifieds - but I won’t be upset at all if I don’t sell it…
I'm back with the Streamliner now...I prefer the Streamliner over the Shuttle myself
I was offered a good price on my Streamliner and foolishly sold it. But I've really been getting into my Shuttlemax 9.2 and it's been great. Once it's been dialed in, I get some serious thunder from it. Mates well with my Mesa 215.I'm back with the Streamliner now...
The Shuttle is a GREAT amp, but ultimately I like my amps to have a slightly "rude" quality.
And the Shuttle was dapper and well-mannered.
Ha! The restlessness of bassists…I was offered a good price on my Streamliner and foolishly sold it. But I've really been getting into my Shuttlemax 9.2 and it's been great. Once it's been dialed in, I get some serious thunder from it. Mates well with my Mesa 215.![]()
