• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

G&L Basses - Why no love?

They're not nice looking basses, are they?
Really?
742210_364476a50db35a76b872fb455563e291.jpg
 
Terrible, horrible, nasty looking things...

IMG_8888.jpg


...and I enjoy the heck out of each one of mine ;)

:D

I have had the pleasure of touring the Fender and G&L factories (which are only about 20-miles apart), and can tell you first hand that the size of the G&L operation is a fraction of Fender's. Both make great instruments, but there appears to be more care and attention to detail at G&L; the employees seem much happier too, which I believe makes its way to the final product.

Why don't we see more "pro's" playing G&L? Beats me. Their [Invalid or Expired Link Removed] past & present is still impressive. One reason may be that companies such as Fender have much more money to throw at people to play their stuff... In the end, the lack of high profile player endorsements is likely keeping that cost from being passed on to the regular customer-- i.e. most of us.

If you want to play the exact same instrument as your favorite star, the good news is you can! Go forth, spend your money & have fun. For those of us who want a high quality, American built instrument with a bunch of available options for a reasonable price-- we have G&L :D

G&L's unique sound: Remember that the goal of George & Leo was to continue improving on their designs-- so it stands to reason that G&L would sound a lot like Fender. Personally, I LOVE the MFD pickups and have never found them uncontrollable or too hot... maybe that's because I just plug straight into the amp and adjust controls accordingly? Who knows. When you find something that works for you, you go with it! ;)
 
No they are not. G&L are 6 bolt.

even if you ignore that & still try and put it on there, G&L are 22 frets & they don't do it by using an overhang
the neck & fretboard are solid all the way down into the pocket
so a G&L neck wouldn't fit on a Fender w/o some woodwork & a Fender neck wouldn't fit on a G&L w/o a gap at the heel
then there's the width, which I'm not even sure about
 
  • Like
Reactions: Pbassmanca
Are G&L and Fender bass necks interchangeable?

even if you ignore that & still try and put it on there, G&L are 22 frets & they don't do it by using an overhang
the neck & fretboard are solid all the way down into the pocket
so a G&L neck wouldn't fit on a Fender w/o some woodwork & a Fender neck wouldn't fit on a G&L w/o a gap at the heel
then there's the width, which I'm not even sure about

No. The answer is no.
 
I have one that I'll be selling shortly.
Why?
It's a 5 and the neck is just not wide enough for my fingers. Build quality is great, sounds great, looks great but it just doesn't work for me.
If it's an L2500, feel free to PM me when you're ready to sell, I want one and I have a feeling you might be in San Diego too ;) truthfully it'll be July before I'll have the revenue to buy anything, such is my seasonal gig schedule, but if soon means a couple months, feel free to hit me up if you think about it.
 
even if you ignore that & still try and put it on there, G&L are 22 frets & they don't do it by using an overhang
the neck & fretboard are solid all the way down into the pocket
so a G&L neck wouldn't fit on a Fender w/o some woodwork & a Fender neck wouldn't fit on a G&L w/o a gap at the heel
then there's the width, which I'm not even sure about
even if you ignore that & still try and put it on there, G&L are 22 frets & they don't do it by using an overhang
the neck & fretboard are solid all the way down into the pocket
so a G&L neck wouldn't fit on a Fender w/o some woodwork & a Fender neck wouldn't fit on a G&L w/o a gap at the heel
then there's the width, which I'm not even sure about
True, true, and true.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Killed_by_Death
They get sold immediately and no one is selling theirs. That's why you never see them in the wild! :smug:

Never found one that had a neck that worked. Had a local shop that sold them. They even had one that was made beck in the day that Leo was still there.

Terrible necks. Stupid and bad sounding electronics. Heavy.

Not pretty. I saw a G&L jazz bass that was urine color. And it was heavy and had a terrible neck and tried to fool ya with a jazz look.

I really don't get it either. Aerosmiths Tom Hamilton plays them a lot.

Personally I'm currently down to one bass. A 2013 American Standard. I'm on my 3rd year with this beauty and no other bass has come close in either sound or feel or pure physical beauty.

How does a neck not work? And I've never heard anyone describe a bass's electronics as "stupid"... I think there's more to this...
 
They have almost zero coverage out on the street, at least in the large metropolitan areas I've lived in. The few ones I've tried have been boat anchors and the headstock V thing is just too ugly to me. I can get Fender telling Leo to cease and desist on the original shape, but it looks like zero thought was put into the replacement (and I've heard the finger argument).
 
They get sold immediately and no one is selling theirs. That's why you never see them in the wild! :smug:



How does a neck not work? And I've never heard anyone describe a bass's electronics as "stupid"... I think there's more to this...
This is the funniest post I heard all week!
+1000 points.
 
  • Like
Reactions: el_Bajo_Verde
...and ugly.
Usually based on a Fender preference, because it's the standard that has been there since many here were born, so it looks normal, which equals right.
How goofy do you think Fender products looked to musicians, when what had come before were traditional Gibson, D'Angelico, Epiphone shapes?
Their instruments had classic looking finishes reminiscent of violins, beautiful block inlays, bound bodies, bound necks, inlaid logos, very traditional shapes.
The Broadcaster, Telecaster, Stratocaster, and especially the Jazz bass shapes probably looked ridiculous to the musicians who grew up playing 30's, 40's and 50's instruments, and then Fender chose to paint them all kinds of Crayola colors taken from car companies.
The early detractors said they were ugly cowboy guitars for bumkin music, and Country Music players were the audience that Leo originally marketed to.
For all practical purposes, the G&L stuff looks so close to Fender, they could be from the same company if you didn't know better.
If you look at the Fender headstock from a neutral point of view, it's a weird shape., we are all just very used to it.
The G&L headstock shape could easily have been the standard that Leo did and it would be the one that gets compared to all others.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: danosix