Steve,At least one TB'er has done that, and liked at. I think I may be headed in that direction.
I like the chewy feel of Genz's 3DPM, so the other Max models are out, at least in my case. Street price on the feature-packed Max 9.2 and simplified SL900 are the same in the States at the moment (according to MF), so a Streamliner and a ParaEQ actually come out about $300 more expensive, and about 12oz heavier. And with the two discreet channels, the Max is almost like having TWO Empress pedals, footswitchable.
Still, I'm leaning more toward the Streamliner. Last night, the sound of the Streamliner with some added EQ was literally bliss.
For me personally, the telling factors are these:
- My tonal priorities are about 80/20 on the Streamliner side of the fence. I don't think that a Max 9.2 set to do its best emulation of a Streamliner, would meet my needs as well as a tweaked SL900.
- My Streamliner's already paid for. Also, it may be stoopid as heck, but I just like having those tubes in there...
- Fixed-bandwidth semi-parametrics never seem to have the Q I'm looking for at the time. Even if I had a Max with all those knobs, I might still be jonesing for the ParaEQ.
- Channel switching doesn't particularly interest me.
- It's only a few extra inches, but the Max won't fit in my favourite laptop bag. Meanwhile, I've got room for the Empress in my string pouch.
- I can use an outboard parametric for other things, like recording vocals, shaping electric and acoustic guitars, etc.
Of course this stuff is highly personal. Your mileage may (and very likely WILL) vary...
all good and practical points..
Friend recently switched from ShuttleMax to Streamliner. Last weekend we tried preamps for additional tonal options. We tested my PJB Bass Buddy (directly to FX retrun), Sadowsky outboard pre with DIY boost. Both interesting options. He wasn't so excited with BB too much and doesn't like its format, but loves Sadowsky in front of Streamliner (with additional boost it is can really bring some tubey magic and allowed some interesting tonal combinations although it has boost only EQ). Still it works mainly as juicy enhancement device, you cant make any corrective cuts with it.
Empress is quite exotic here and i've never seen it on any gig (also overseas postage bumps its price), but on paper specs looks great. Very nice is, it has quite high input impedance and allows 18V powering (expecting some internal headroom and good output levels), that way it could serve not only as additional tweaking box but as complete clean channel for Streamliner (to FX return). Maybe it could sound good for some applications (although it will bypass internal HPF).
If you're going to that direction, test it with Streamliner, i will be very excited about hearing, how you like it.
Michal
