• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Genzler Amplification Club

I feel like channel one or clean channel is like a modern clean really thumping sound. Really 3D sounding and full of life. Great headroom and like i said very modern, an the contour button seems to add tightness.


Channel 2 and second contour seems more modern sounding not as thumpy but still great
 
I feel like channel one or clean channel is like a modern clean really thumping sound. Really 3D sounding and full of life. Great headroom and like i said very modern, an the contour button seems to add tightness.


Channel 2 and the second contour seems more modern sounding not as thumpy but still great

Thank you for using our Magellan 800. I agree with @Joeykun and his comments.
I think you're also right on with your assessment of the CLEAN channel. Your also correct about the DRIVE channel in that there will be less "thump", but I would call in more of a vintage tone/vibe. As mentioned as you roll up the GAIN control you will also narrow the frequency response of this channel ----- as you turn the control you'll attenuate the lows slightly and the top end as well. This works well for several tonal settings. Keeping the Gain setting cleaner with a little harmonic content and "furr" you'll get more of that tubby characteristic. As you drive the GAIN higher and get into more of an overdrive range you tone will be smooth without flubby low end or buzzy top end. Lots of versatility in the GAIN channel and the use of either A or B Contour.
Hope this is helpful.
 
Digging this Channel/Contour/EQ combo direct to my practice board.

And don’t mind the mess behind the MG 800. :rolleyes:

image.jpg
 
Thank you for using our Magellan 800. I agree with @Joeykun and his comments.
I think you're also right on with your assessment of the CLEAN channel. Your also correct about the DRIVE channel in that there will be less "thump", but I would call in more of a vintage tone/vibe. As mentioned as you roll up the GAIN control you will also narrow the frequency response of this channel ----- as you turn the control you'll attenuate the lows slightly and the top end as well. This works well for several tonal settings. Keeping the Gain setting cleaner with a little harmonic content and "furr" you'll get more of that tubby characteristic. As you drive the GAIN higher and get into more of an overdrive range you tone will be smooth without flubby low end or buzzy top end. Lots of versatility in the GAIN channel and the use of either A or B Contour.
Hope this is helpful.

Yeah, I love the Drive channel to produce just a little edge. It sounds very much alive but still 'in control'... The A/B contour control then allows me to have that edge added to both a more modern as well as a more vintage toneshape. You gotta love it...
 
  • Like
Reactions: Jeff Genzler
Updated roster - 29th, 2020

As usual, please PM me if you'd like to join, and if I've missed anybody please let me know.

What I will try going forward is to create a draft roster where I will collect new entries and post once every couple of weeks or so, as needed.

#1 - Jeff Genzler
#2 - Discount Saint
#3 - revroy
#4 - MichaelOz
#5 - Hotblack
#6 - davel66
#7 - bebass
#8 - Ryan L.
#9 - bassnz
#10 - gclark51
#11 - paujones
#12 - Spfairchild
#13 - 1bassplayin
#14 - BluesyCat
#15 - Eddie LeBlanc
#16 - BuffaloBob4343
#17 - SWRnut
#18 - BruiserYL
#19 - jgolfer
#20 - danhilde
#21 - ExaltBass
#22 - kobass
#23 - pachoate
#24 - TheRealKong
#25 - ccbass71
#26 - Sav'nBass+
#27 - IanA
#28 - campbems
#29 - jazzenfunk
#30 - jlepre
#31 - jobbermania
#32 - pablomigraine
#33 - flewis
#34 - Tdub77
#35 - tombowlus
#36 - arrowsun
#37 - noahw1
#38 - tkonbass
#39 - svtb15
#40 - JLY
#41 - rodl2005
#42 - Double Agent
#43 - cv115505
#44 - Tonycarlson
#45 - guitarbrent
#46 - dwellers
#47 - motorhall
#48 - SadowskySteve
#49 - ergodynebass
#50 - Cube Bass
#51 - metallicafan18
#52 - ThePolarBeard
#53 - RColie
#54 - slinkyphil
#55 - bassjam
#56 - 3bc
#57 - Hunter34
#58 - LennyJ
#59 - lordradish
#60 - sigterm
#61 - Cazman
#62 - jwitzend
#63 - Wicked G
#64 - FunkySpoo
#65 - Loring
#66 - rok51
#67 - Cracker7
#68 - alexbrownebass
#69 - P-bass bluesman
#70 - Holdsg
#71 - PaddyMcBass
#72 - Wicked Thunder
#72 - WickedThunder
#73 - draygriff
#74 - Fred312b
#75 - Nightman
#76 - ferarayabass
#77 - BlueLou
#78 - ThumbyAche
#79 - RNG1
#80 - Turtle71
#81 - berman3313
#82 - Modulus 96
#83 - ChrisWright
#84 - Joeykun
#85 - DrSteve
#86 - Chipit
#87 - Todd Larson
#88 - theShrink
#89 - Sodbuster
#90 - Basehead
#91 - Dontleavedayjob
#92 - Rob Klaassen
#93 - crucislancer
#94 - Link Removed
#95 - Han_Mono
#96 - arnebv
#97 - Zoffy
#98 - Link Removed
#99 - PhishPhan22
#100 - Link Removed
#101 - duncmill
#102 - FeltTipPen
#103 - Mr. Business
#104 - drewonedge
#105 - Basselink
#106 - PaulS
#107 - ROY PENNON
#108 - rowsi
#109 - KJAXE
#110 - Spupilup
#111 - Oori
 
Thank you for using our Magellan 800. I agree with @Joeykun and his comments.
I think you're also right on with your assessment of the CLEAN channel. Your also correct about the DRIVE channel in that there will be less "thump", but I would call in more of a vintage tone/vibe. As mentioned as you roll up the GAIN control you will also narrow the frequency response of this channel ----- as you turn the control you'll attenuate the lows slightly and the top end as well. This works well for several tonal settings. Keeping the Gain setting cleaner with a little harmonic content and "furr" you'll get more of that tubby characteristic. As you drive the GAIN higher and get into more of an overdrive range you tone will be smooth without flubby low end or buzzy top end. Lots of versatility in the GAIN channel and the use of either A or B Contour.
Hope this is helpful.
Thanks for this. I'd been wondering why I'd been unsatisfied with the gain channel. I guess I just need to mess with the contour more than I do. I don't mess with it much during gigs, but I suppose I can use tape to mark the two different settings for my clean and OD settings.

Along those same lines, I'm used to using EQ to get "my" tone, and then refining it with the contour, but, lately, I've been starting with the EQ flat, getting close with the contour, and then using EQ to fine tune.

I guess I've just been so happy to have such an effective EQ section that can either be as transparent or as colorful as I want, that I've stayed away from the contour.
 
Thanks for this. I'd been wondering why I'd been unsatisfied with the gain channel. I guess I just need to mess with the contour more than I do. I don't mess with it much during gigs, but I suppose I can use tape to mark the two different settings for my clean and OD settings.

Along those same lines, I'm used to using EQ to get "my" tone, and then refining it with the contour, but, lately, I've been starting with the EQ flat, getting close with the contour, and then using EQ to fine tune.

I guess I've just been so happy to have such an effective EQ section that can either be as transparent or as colorful as I want, that I've stayed away from the contour.

@unbridled ---- thanks for using the MG-800. I would recommend using the Contour function first and keep your EQ flat. Get your tone "settled" with the amp and your instrument with either Contour A or B and then season to final taste with the EQ. So many various players I talk with (men and women) barely touch the EQ unless to clean up an issue in a specific room, or stage. Hope this helps.
 
@unbridled ---- thanks for using the MG-800. I would recommend using the Contour function first and keep your EQ flat. Get your tone "settled" with the amp and your instrument with either Contour A or B and then season to final taste with the EQ. So many various players I talk with (men and women) barely touch the EQ unless to clean up an issue in a specific room, or stage. Hope this helps.
Not necessary