• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

GK mb200 ultra light head?

Status
Not open for further replies.
GKstandby.gif

Standby , your thread will engage in 3-2-1...

What Schroeder cab is that underneath it? I'm looking for another cab.
 
Here's a photo of my MB200 with two Kovalcik Audio 112 Cabs (8 ohm, 250W, 98 dB SPL @ 1m each).

I like how it fits in my Stanley tool box along with my cables, straps, etc.

I've used the MB200 for electric bass, electric guitar (Strat), Martin acoustic guitar and Kala ukulele (both with K&K Sound Pickups). The preamp and DI sound excellent through my church's PA system. I no longer need my LR Baggs Para-Acoustic DI. With the contour switch "on," it provides that perfect mid-scoop curve for most acoustic instruments. I believe jazz guitarists should consider this over Evans, Henriksen, Acoustic Image, etc.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_7394.jpg
    IMG_7394.jpg
    132.7 KB · Views: 119
  • IMG_7391.jpg
    IMG_7391.jpg
    101.6 KB · Views: 119
Has anyone tried a 112MBX with their MB200?

I just purchased an MB500 to run with my pair of Bag End S15-Ds and am intrigued enough to consider replacing or supplanting my MBE150E-112 + 112MBX combo with an MB200 and my existing extension cab.
 
Has anyone tried a 112MBX with their MB200?

I just purchased an MB500 to run with my pair of Bag End S15-Ds and am intrigued enough to consider replacing or supplanting my MBE150E-112 + 112MBX combo with an MB200 and my existing extension cab.

I am to receive a 112 MBX ext cab on monday. It's only rated for 100 watts, I don't expect much. But at 12 lbs it will be great for a quick rehearsal. I will post soon after receiving.
 
Please report back! I've even given thought to adding a second jack to the MBX and running a pair of them.

I've always liked my MBX's tone but have always thought the MBE150 was a little too fiddly for my tastes. The MB200, meanwhile...

I tried my MB200 into my MBX. Doesn't sound a whole lot different than my MBE150. Now running my MB200 into my GK Neo 112... that's a very different story. Big, deep, bold, etc. And lately my RB700-II is staying home and my small bar/pub rig is my MB200 into my GK Neo 212. Doesn't leave me tons of headroom, but if it's loud enough, how much extra do you really need?
 
  • Like
Reactions: rickbass1
Tried the MB200 with a GK112MBX ext cab.

Volume 12:00, bass boosted to 3:00

It sounds just OK, good enough for a small rehearsal, or a coffee house gig.

The speaker did fartout at one point, but I was playing hard.
The cab has only one 1/4" output jack. No nameplate with specs, origin, serial number,etc. For being a very small metal cab...it does not rattle. 12lbs.
Handle on top, rubber feet, metal grill.
 
Just a tad OT but yesterday I received my GK MB112 combo, which I think has the MB200 amp as it's electronic heart?

I bought it for coffee shop and small jazz gigs and I am so thrilled with it. The 12" cab is the perfect match IMHO and as I understand it has a 4 ohm speaker fitted so gets the full mojo from the amp.

I could not be more happy with the new purchase :)
 
Just a tad OT but yesterday I received my GK MB112 combo, which I think has the MB200 amp as it's electronic heart?

I bought it for coffee shop and small jazz gigs and I am so thrilled with it. The 12" cab is the perfect match IMHO and as I understand it has a 4 ohm speaker fitted so gets the full mojo from the amp.

I could not be more happy with the new purchase :)

Not OT!. Congrats glad you like it:cool:
 
Having owned one for a couple of months, I found a setting I really like (using a jazz bass), but I it's starting to distort/clip with gain at about 1 o' clock, and when I don't use contour I have more headroom (starts clipping at about 3 o'clock).

Could somebody please try this setting and tell my your results, and if it starts clipping earlier than with your usual setting?

-10 db pad: OFF
Contour: ON

Treble: 9:30
Hi mid: 3:30
Lo mid: 3:00
Bass: 10:00

I like the 500Hz cut with contour on, but have to boost hi and lo mids pretty much to compensate mids.
 
Just picked up an MB200 this morning to go with my new-to-me Berg HT112 for smaller/corporate gigs and such. I brought the cab into the shop to test the head and was very impressed with the tone and sheer amount of volume I could get out of it. I wanted to get a 500 but availability is currently really limited and I "needed" a micro right now. :D

I compared with the LMIII and vastly preferred the GK.

Really? Why? I have the LMII and thinking of getting a different head...
 
Having owned one for a couple of months, I found a setting I really like (using a jazz bass), but I it's starting to distort/clip with gain at about 1 o' clock, and when I don't use contour I have more headroom (starts clipping at about 3 o'clock).

Could somebody please try this setting and tell my your results, and if it starts clipping earlier than with your usual setting?

-10 db pad: OFF
Contour: ON

Treble: 9:30
Hi mid: 3:30
Lo mid: 3:00
Bass: 10:00

I like the 500Hz cut with contour on, but have to boost hi and lo mids pretty much to compensate mids.

I've not actually dialed in your settings but I too use a jazz bass with my MB112 combo and it seems a little odd to me that you use the contour, which reduces the mids and lifts the top and bass, and then you set your tone to lift up the mids and cut the top end.

FWIW, and I have only had mine for two days, so a total newb, but I use contour off and the tone pretty much flat with just a touch of lift in the low mid and a touch of cut on the treble.

FWIW I would have thought that contour off and tone set flat would be a better starting point. Just my two cents.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.