GK is not so good in my world, right in line with Peavey and Hartke. I don't like any of the 3 for many reasons.
Aguilar shouldn't even be spoken in the same sentence with ... who was that other company again?
In your world. Not everyone's.

TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
GK is not so good in my world, right in line with Peavey and Hartke. I don't like any of the 3 for many reasons.
Aguilar shouldn't even be spoken in the same sentence with ... who was that other company again?

GK is not so good in my world, right in line with Peavey and Hartke. I don't like any of the 3 for many reasons.
Aguilar shouldn't even be spoken in the same sentence with ... who was that other company again?
Hmmmm...TH stomp box? That's not a bad idea! I was also considering the dimensions & weight of my GK. it's so heavy in the rack with tuner & power conditioner. Sometimes I feel like the amp rack feels heavier then my Aggie cabs! Lol I play with brites so I'm assuming I might miss my GK if I choose to sell it.
I just bought a used like new TH effects pedal here last week. I ran it thru the effects return of my brand new GB Shuttle 9.2 head. WOW! It is now a thumping, darn near 900 watt TH head with my 4 ohm cabs. And now I can power my 8 ohm cabs with about 500 watts as well.
I also recently traded a TBer for is also like new MB500 head. Yeah, I know I been kinda GASsy lately. I like that little amp fine but not exactly my fave tone for my blues/r&b/soul bands.
I really wanted to try a TH500 amp but I had just bought the GB amp. Its a very nice amp in itself but now I can use it as is or add the TH pedal, bypassing the GB pre for a 900 watt TH tone. Very happy with these two options. But my Streamliner 900 still gets the gigs.
The TH pedal def worth a consideration if you wanna keep your GK head. I need to try the TH pedal with my MB500 to see what that does.
You do know the TH500, Streamline 900 and Shuttle 9.2 use the same power amp module, right?
Yeah. It's tempting hey. I've been pacing around the idea of applying the Tonehammer pedal to my frontend for about two years. Nearly pulled the trigger on it once or twice but my disposable income has always been too low. Best thing about the pedal is that it's a great stand-alone DI solution for any gig with reliable PA support. Just put it in your gig bag and leave the heavy amp at home.
Hmmmm...TH stomp box? That's not a bad idea! I was also considering the dimensions & weight of my GK. it's so heavy in the rack with tuner & power conditioner. Sometimes I feel like the amp rack feels heavier then my Aggie cabs! Lol I play with brites so I'm assuming I might miss my GK if I choose to sell it.
I was shooting for a different tone of the STM-900 when I bought the 9.2 recently but I found it to be too similar to the STM-900. I posted the 9.2 for trade but didn't get any offers I wanted. So I'm keeping the 9.2 and got the TH pedal to use it with. Sounds much different to me now. And still different than my STM-900, I feel.
What's your point exactly, that the three amps have very similar power amp capabilities? But still different tones than each other. No?
Best of both but smaller and lighter sounds like the G-K MB Fusion calling?