So everyone but the BL digs your style, but the BL fired you anyway. I cant for the life of me understand the concept of a band leader.
This. Times 1.7 gagillion.
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
So everyone but the BL digs your style, but the BL fired you anyway. I cant for the life of me understand the concept of a band leader.
The BL would pick very obscure songs from the 50's and want to "do them just like the record".
Should I have just done what the BL wanted at the cost of sounding better?
So everyone but the BL digs your style, but the BL fired you anyway. I cant for the life of me understand the concept of a band leader.
I can. Can anyone else see through this or am I the only one? See, there are always two sides to every story. And then there is the truth. We've got one side here and a lot of posters eager to jump on the BL. There is more to this. I'm not jumping on the OP, I've just seen this thing- experienced this thing more than once.
Thanks for all the good feedback. I can honestly say that I agree with everything you all have said.
I guess that the truth is I really didn't want the spot all that much or I would have played it the way the BL wanted it played.
The guy is quite good at what he does and I respect that. I guess as a "traditional blues" aficionado he definitely plays in a very narrow niche. I just don't have the kind of love for the "blind lemon two tooth" tradition that was the goal of the BL.
Had I known that was the goal I wouldn't have done it in the first place. So I guess I will know to ask more questions sooner.
I've honestly never been a really good "sideman". I am always trying to stretch things to a new place. I guess that sometimes it works and sometimes it doesn't.
Thanks again.
As much as I love Jack Bruce, I've heard that guy kill more blues feels than I can count.
I agree. Dude is a badass on the bass, but sometimes the Mustang Sally approach prevails in regards to the overall sound.
The old stuff doesn't have to be boring. Canned Heat (Larry Taylor) did a lot of cool stuff.
I can. Can anyone else see through this or am I the only one? See, there are always two sides to every story. And then there is the truth. We've got one side here and a lot of posters eager to jump on the BL. There is more to this. I'm not jumping on the OP, I've just seen this thing- experienced this thing more than once.
I cant for the life of me understand the concept of a band leader.
I still cant see how having one band member being the dictator could possibly be a good thing.
Should I have just done what the BL wanted at the cost of sounding better?
I've heard this expressed by so many people in TB over the years.
Are you really serious? It's a pretty standard way of working in the music business.
Sorry, I would never want to be in a band with a "boss" that thinks he has the right to tell me how and what to play.
What if it was, say, Sting, and he was going to pay you 5K per gig. And he had charts, which you are required to stick to. Would you do it?
What if it was, say, Sting, and he was going to pay you 5K per gig. And he had charts, which you are required to stick to. Would you do it?
Or, on a local level, what if it's a guy who has busted his ass for years to build his band into a recognizable brand, has a corner on the better rooms in town, has a proven successful image and direction, has contacts and connections, is a marketing bulldog, and gives his musicians above-average performance opportunities and pay?
I'm sure it still wouldn't be worth it for some musicians. I'm sure it would be a fair and good arrangement for many others.