TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
Then go buy from Rondinelli in Dubuque. I really dig my Rumble 200 head. Good tonal control(I punch up lo mids)decent onboard overdrive Plenty loud with stacked GK115s(@ 4Ω) No pre eq choice on xlr out but I get that at the wireless receiver. Don't use the eq buttons much, occasionally the Vintage one.Dont have it yet, but I just did some testing and I've got my heart set on a Rumble 500. 350 watts at 8 ohms, 500 @ 4. I have the 100 combo, love it and want a bigger one now!
What I like is they are cheap, powerful, and light. I also like the tone and simplicity of controls. The biggest complaint I hear about them is the "baked in" fender tone, that you either like it or not. But definitely worth adding to the list!
I went in thinking I would prefer the 15, but i really liked the 2x10. So crisp and clear!
I think it's the voicing of the Rumbles in general and not so much the need for a sweepable mid. Rumbles are fine little amps but I find they don't easily lend themselves to mid forward sounds regardless of the bass.I'm a bit wary of people's amp recommendations for Stingrays. I find them naturally more scooped compared with J's or P's which are more prevalent. I have a Rumble 100 which scoops the mids even more when the EQ is flat so I lose a lot of of mids compared with the dry signal and the lo-mid & high mid EQ in the rumble overlaps my bass's EQ so I can't bring back the mids with the amp easily. Having a sweepable/selectable mid I think is important to overcome amp manufacturer's bias for Fender bass tone preferences.
Hello,
After years of playing loaners and out of low-wattage practice combos, I would like to dip my toes into actually setting up a small but decent bass amp rig.
For my intents and uses (home recording and small occasional bar gigs, all usually with a PA) I've been looking at something around the 200-300 wattage range. I have no need to go much bigger than that, and budget constraints obviously play a factor in that too.
To start, I've been looking exclusively at Class D stuff, particularly those of the 'ultra compact' variety. Ideally I would like a relatively small amp and a small accompanying cab (110, 112, 115, etc.) with the far future plan of adding an additional cab as needs and purposes arise.
I'd like to ideally avoid combos, but if someone has an opinion on one that can be hooked up to cabs to later expand upon, I'm game.
Sound wise, something straightforward that I can tinker for just a touch bare smidge of flavor in tone is ideal.
Here's a list of what I have more or less narrowed it down to:
1. TC BH250
2. Markbass Nano 300/ Little Mark Blackline 250
3. Trace Eliot Elf
4. GK MB200
If possible, I would like to hear everyone's individual experiences and opinions, and possibly comparisons between any of them. Any separate individual threads on any of these are usually just people GASing over them, with not much objective descriptions of the sound.
I live in small college town of Iowa City, and there are only two close by music stores, both of which don't have a very good selection of bass amp rigs to test play, so I'm mostly gambling my choice with online references and opinions. (and I'm ok with that)
Thank you very much.So far I'm leaning towards the MB Blackline. In no shortage thanks to Jimmy giving a very concise description of what I was looking for in terms of sound and tonal descriptions.
Nice to hear a positive review of the 200 head! I know theres a lot of love for the 200 combo here.I really dig my Rumble 200 head. Good tonal control(I punch up lo mids)decent onboard overdrive Plenty loud with stacked GK115s(@ 4Ω) No pre eq choice on xlr out but I get that at the wireless receiver. Don't use the eq buttons much, occasionally the Vintage one.
Run my pedals through the fx loop.