• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Help with Mystery Gibson Blackbird/Thunderbird

Ok, this is going to be a bit long-winded, but I thought that the more info I posted about the item, the better!
I am a touring professional who has (and still) tours all over the world with various acts. I am a "crew" guy and don't play in a band. I play and collect whatever guitars and basses strike my fancy (mainly 80's Japanese stuff).
I was an employee of a band that was on Motley Crue's "Crue Fest 1" back in 2008. I had a lot of friends on that tour and it was a great and successful tour.
From around 2000 to 2004 Nikki Sixx was in a few different bands before Motley got back full force to tour with the original lineup. He had his bands Brides of Destruction and 58 (and even to this day his other band Sixx Am is still going from about 2006).
Between 2000 and 2003, Gibson made a signature model which you all know called the "Blackbird". It was later re-introduced..I'm not sure of the changes made on later versions, if any.
SO here is where the story starts. I purchased a Blackbird directly from Nikki's bass tech at the time (actually while the tour was still going and we were at a show!). I became good friends with his tech and Nikki was a good friend of the band I worked for (one of our band members was even in one of his other bands with him). I always used to hound them to sell me something since Motley was one of my favorites. A few days before the end of the tour, Nikki's tech comes into our tour bus holding a case. Now mind you this is in front of the band I worked for and others. He informs me that he can sell me a bass that Nikki had that he doesn't use anymore. He used it for some Brides of Destructions shows and maybe a few Motley shows as a backup. He didn't like it. The tech explained to me that when Motley started getting some steam again, Nikki wanted to change a few things up and was dealing with Gibson to do a few changes on the Blackbird. The model he presented he said was a kind of in-between test to see if Nikki wanted to continue on making a new Blackbird model. He didn't want to and Nikki decided to just stick with the regular red or other color Thunderbirds. The Blackbird was dropped from the Gibson lineup in 2003 (until re-issued years later I believe).
SO, what I have here is a Blackbird with some very wrong things to it. The story above all came from the guitar tech. Last year we showed the guitar to the current Motley techs, and they don't know anything about it. The headstock first of all is the "skinny" type and not the usual Blackbird size. It also doesn't have the raised middle section on the body where the wings WOULD be attached to (it's flat as a slab like Nikki's older Spectors). I realized that this thing could be a fake somehow, but the tech that sold it to me did not try to hide or sneak it to me, he bought it to me with plenty of other tour people around and we made the deal.
I also showed it to Nikki's original tech (who is a friend of mine as well) who helped Nikki design the original Blackbird with Gibson and he pointed several things out. He said the fretboard, inlays, pickups, placement of the finger rest and switch, the case, and some other things were definitely real, but the rest looked fake. He wasn't around in the later years when this "supposed prototype" came from Gibson. Why would someone making a fake use real Blackbird parts, fretboard, and case? Anyway, I was distraught. There is even another bridge in the case that the tech said they had swapped out to try something different. Anyway, still a mystery.
I then emailed someone we knew from Gibson to check the serial number and get any info or to see if it was even legit. Gibson actually answered with "While I cannot verify if this was indeed an artist related instrument, I can say that it appears consistent with a 2006 Nikki Sixx Blackbird". The headstock looks nothing like it unless one looks at the 5-string models. Anyway, I'm still baffled. Just throwing this out there to you bass experts to see what you think!
IMG_2762.JPG
IMG_2763.JPG
IMG_2765.JPG
IMG_2773.JPG
IMG_2778.JPG
IMG_2780.JPG
IMG_2787.JPG
IMG_2813.JPG
IMG_2821.JPG
 
That's a bastard Studio model, Gibson keeps notoriously bad records so no surprise there. The small headstock, set neck, lack of a raised center block are all consistant with a four string version. The inlaid neck is what sets it apart. The rest of the parts are stock N.S. Mk.I Blackbird issue except for the black aftermarket bridge.
 
Looks like a studio Thunderbird of some stripe, without documentation it's difficult to say if that bass was provided to Nikki in that form. The story sounds plausible but.
 
The paint on the factory Blackbird was VERY thick. The paint on this bass is thin enough that you can see the wood grain. Also, the Blackbird pickguard on the OP's bass is ill-fitting. And the inlays on the OP's bass seems to be made of a different material than the production Blackbird.

There are no holes drilled for the controls you'd find on a normal Studio model, so it's unlikely a regular Studio that was converted. The serial number certainly puts this bass in the "in between" time period. As you can see, my serial number pre-dates the OP's bass, and I bought mine just about the time they discontinued production. Gibson did, at least for a time, stamp the guitars they gave as comp's to musicians with "promotional model - not for sale" stamped in the back of the headstock. I owned one for a time.

This could be a factory made bass, though I doubt is was given to Nikki Six as a prototype for him to approve. Outside of this bass being a studio model, there is no difference between this and a normal Blackbird. There are no changes to approve.





8xxm.jpg

ade8x.jpg

v792a.jpg
 
That 3 point bridge wouldnt work without major work to the bass, so that wasnt ever on there. The bridge on it now is correct for a studio bird and as others said its a studio t bird, I am sure gibson did that and it was a 1 off type thing they sent to him and he didnt like. I have no real doubts on that story though, maybe he wanted something lighter. For someone to take a studio then spend the time faking it into a blackbird would require way to much work then just buying a blackbird, I bought a beat blackbird off ebay for like $850 with just finish wear and no breaks,so I dont see it plausible to fake one with a real studio.

Here is a studio, all the same even the bridge.

b60fe9eec390939d26a028fff74dcd6c.jpg
 
I was expecting a three point bridge and got it. The thin finish and neck joint remind me a lot of my NR. The pickguard looks a little funny. As for there being no changes to approve, if this is a bass for Nikki Six, the changes could have been purely cosmetic. Hard to say if this is what you were told it was.
 
Thing is, there are not cosmetic changes between the OP's bass and the production model. Same cosmetics, same hardware. The only difference is that the OP's bass is a cheaper model. As I recall, the 2nd generation NSixx bass was a more expensive T'bird with a figured top, volume and tone controls, and "X" inlays.
 
Thanks so much guys! Since I was the one that got it on that tour, I didn't mention that everyday when I saw Nikki's bass vault open and ready, this bass was never in it. It was always stored in the case in a bigger road case with other backups or other crap. It def didn't mean anything special to him or his tech at the time since that was the only one he said he would consider selling. Anyway, I searched all over the 'net and never typed in "Studio" Blackbird/Thunderbird. Now I can see that thin headstock and no raised mid section on other models! Is Gibson really that bad with records? Even back then on the Motley tour I heard the tech say how they almost had enough of Gibson. They would order a few basses that took forever to get or not get at all. They even said that when Gibson would come out to take the promo photos for the new yearly catalogue, then that was it. After they got their photos, it was like pulling teeth to get anything out of them for the rest of the year...lol.
 
Thing is, there are not cosmetic changes between the OP's bass and the production model. Same cosmetics, same hardware. The only difference is that the OP's bass is a cheaper model. As I recall, the 2nd generation NSixx bass was a more expensive T'bird with a figured top, volume and tone controls, and "X" inlays.

Meaning Gibson could have taken a raw carcass studio model prior to painting, sprayed it flat blackwith blackbird paint and thrown on all the blackbird parts. Wouldn't have taken much more time then making a standard blackbird. Then they shipped it off to him maybe hoping he would like it and they could sell a cheaper model more attainable by fans. Or something like that. I would bet money on this being factory made for Nikki as the tech said, its just not something that would be faked with a actual Gibson. I guess a way to find out if its fake is are the inlays real or stickers? also under the control cavity can you see 2 extra holes someone would have plugged prior to refinishing it? as Gibson likely would have just not drilled 3 holes to plug 2 when they could have just ordered only 1 drilled.

The bass has also had the strap buttons moved from stock studio positions to the positions Nikki has on his black bird sigs, making me think he got it and had the tech move the strap pins.

I dont know but to me its not much of a stretch to see gibson making this randomly.
 
And that is true because I did hear them talking about wanting to make a more affordable Blackbird back then...is this before the Epiphone versions came out? The inlays are real inlaid iron crosses and look to be pearl...and they aren't all shoddy..they look right but someone mentioned they look different?
 
I have no idea when the Epiphone model came out. Those inlays look fine. There is just no way someone would buy a studio t bird, strip it to bare wood, plug 2 of the control holes, refinish it a satin black , inlay real pearl crosses and then put on all the blackbird hardware in order to make the bass look like a authentic blackbird yet it doesnt because its a studio version. No one with the eye for detail would do that good of a job yet start with a studio t bird because its never going to look like a authentic blackbird due to body type and headstock. Gibson had to have had some down time or a eager artist relation person or something. Like I said I got a real blackbird for $850 and the paint was super worn on it like as if Nikki would have played it with a huge belt buckle on, if someone was trying to lie to someone they would just buy a bass like that and claim Nikki wore it out on some tours. I am sure he just didn't like this bass due to it probably having a slightly cheaper feel to it. Like I said about the strap pins being moved to his positions he obviously tried it out awhile.

I mean authentication is always great so if you can get that some how its going to be worth something to someone. Its also a 1 off Gibson so it has that going for it. I would think someone at Gibson that worked with Nikki on the blackbird sig would be able to tell you its legit. I dont know how to find out who worked with him but usually there are a few guys that meet with a artist and hash out some details prior to building.
 
It could be legit. The only thunderbird I know that has no wood carved out of the front was the blackbird, and this too looks to be the case. Any other Tbird has a wiring cavity visible behind the pickguard when it's removed. The fact that it's stained might be the reason why the new red one was stained instead of a solid or nitro finish.