• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Higher-End Wireless In-Ear Solutions

Barisaxman

Gold Supporting Member
Aug 17, 2005
988
815
Omaha, NE
Hey all, thinking of moving from my trusty Shure PSM200 system (100's of gigs on these) to something a little "better" that can do a stereo mix (stereo mix capability is a non-issue) and possibly with a little nicer limiting. Anybody using/used any of the units a step up from these, e.g. PSM900, Sennheiser G3, A/T M3M, or AKG IVM4500? I don't doubt that all are quality equipment, just wanted to see if there was any feedback on particular units from my bass-playing brethren.

Thanks!
 
I play sax/run sound for a 9-piece band, so while I don't have experience playing bass and using in-ears, I'm listening in on everyone's mixes, including the bass player's, whenever we play. I own a PSM900, one of my bandmates has a Sennheiser G3, and the rest are on G2s. I went with the PSM for a couple reasons:

-Racks right next to my SLX receiver.
-Removable antenna on the beltpack (as opposed to the more-breakable G2/G3 antenna)
-The controls on the transmitter are easier to navigate, and it's easier to change functions quickly (like dropping Tx power). There's also a separate kill switch for the transmitter, so you can run it without it transmitting.
-The beltpack is very solid, and slimmer than the Sennheiser.
-5-segment battery life meter
-I think they sound noticeably better than the G2, though I haven't compared the G3 directly. The limiter is not too obnoxious.
-You don't have to buy a separate rack mount kit (though there's a price difference).

Overall, I'm super happy with them, and it was totally worth the purchase price.