• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

How are Fender Flatwounds?

I have been experimenting with different flats. experimenting with different flats. I tried Labella’s and liked them a lot. I had a set of Chromes that were pretty good. I tried Roto Sound Jazz 77’s and I could not intornat the E strong so they came off right away. They sounded ok but I would not use them. I then bought a set of Fender flats and I have to say I like them as much as the Labella’s but in a different way. The Fenders are more modern sounding if that makes sense. I'd like to try EB cobalt flats next. BTW these were all installed on a Fender jazz bass.
 
I have been experimenting with different flats. experimenting with different flats. I tried Labella’s and liked them a lot. I had a set of Chromes that were pretty good. I tried Roto Sound Jazz 77’s and I could not intornat the E strong so they came off right away. They sounded ok but I would not use them. I then bought a set of Fender flats and I have to say I like them as much as the Labella’s but in a different way. The Fenders are more modern sounding if that makes sense. I'd like to try EB cobalt flats next. BTW these were all installed on a Fender jazz bass.
Yes, I designed these strings. They reason they sound more "modern" is that I wanted a set of flats that wasn't "too" thumpy. I was aiming for more clarity while still retaining the warmth of other flats.
 
I'm looking for flats! And Fender has some out there that are noticeably less expensive than everyone else, even my personal favorite for rounds, Rotosound. Are they dreadful little pieces of metal, and that's why they're on the cheap, or are they just not expensive for some other unseen reason? I'm not picky at all with my flats, really, but I can tell when they absolutely suck, and when they sing. I know I'm not getting the best quality at this price point, but I don't mind. As long as I get that vibe, I can work with it.
Fender flats are amazing in my experience. They feel very smooth and sound great
 
  • Like
Reactions: J-Mags and HMZ
I'm a huge fan of Fender flats. I have nothing bad to say. When new, they have some of the elasticity of round wounds, and they get all nice and middy over time. They seem to last forever. They have a more balanced low end than some flats, which I prefer, and they can still do warm and woody.

I was just tickled when I realized that my favorite flats were also the cheapest flats.

Well I think you achieve your goal. The set i bought was 100-85-65-45. I wish I got the 105 E instead of the 100 but oh well next time.

They sell that set? Last time I had to make that set out of two sets - the 100 and the 45 from a set of 9050Ls and the 85 and 65 from a set of MLs. It didn't bother me because I had a couple sets lying around, and I never change them, but if they sell that, I'm buying.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Akiyama
I personally have always preferred 45-60-80-105 over 45-65-85-105 for better balance in both tension and feel across all four strings.

[Invalid or Expired Link Removed]

I don't care that much about balanced tension. I find that the 100 E string has plenty of punch even when the tension is lower, and I use the flappiness in my playing. I generally prefer .100 flats. The Ls are great, but I prefer the .065 and .085 D and A strings.
 
I don't care that much about balanced tension. I find that the 100 E string has plenty of punch even when the tension is lower, and I use the flappiness in my playing. I generally prefer .100 flats. The Ls are great, but I prefer the .065 and .085 D and A strings.
I like the 105 E because it's not floppy. I find with thicker strings I can go with lower action and the string is staying under my fingers and not floping around. To each his own.
 
I don't care that much about balanced tension. I find that the 100 E string has plenty of punch even when the tension is lower, and I use the flappiness in my playing. I generally prefer .100 flats. The Ls are great, but I prefer the .065 and .085 D and A strings.

I like the 105 E because it's not floppy. I find with thicker strings I can go with lower action and the string is staying under my fingers and not floping around.

My experience tells me it all depends on the bass. The 9050CL (with .105) sounded better on my Jazz, while the 9050L (with .100) sounded better on my Precision.
 
  • Like
Reactions: J-Mags and HMZ
My experience tells me it all depends on the bass. The 9050CL (with .105) sounded better on my Jazz, while the 9050L (with .100) sounded better on my Precision.
9050s didn't sound particularly good on my Jazz, nor did flats in general. The bass came alive when I stopped trying to use flats on it. Not necessarily true of all Jazzes, but true of this one.
 
I like the 105 E because it's not floppy. I find with thicker strings I can go with lower action and the string is staying under my fingers and not floping around. To each his own.

I like that aspect of heavier strings, but I found that where I'd once enjoyed playing old flats, I stopped liking the sound of the heavier ones as much once they were broken in. I do end up chasing strings around the neck occasionally, so I certainly know what you're talking about. I have to practice various little jumps back to the E string.
 
  • Like
Reactions: HMZ
9050s didn't sound particularly good on my Jazz, nor did flats in general. The bass came alive when I stopped trying to use flats on it. Not necessarily true of all Jazzes, but true of this one.

The sound of a Jazz with flats is an acquired taste. As far as flats go, the 9050s seemed to match up with my Jazz the best. But it sounds even better with GHS Pressurewounds, so that's how it's going to stay.
 
  • Like
Reactions: J-Mags
They're not the best strings. I played them on a Fender MIM Fretless Jazz Bass at my local Guitar Center and I kept thinking to myself how I would change them out for La Bella tapes. They sounded dull and lifeless in the low end, but the high mids and highs were nice and sweet. I also didn't like how they felt on my fingers or how they felt when I fretted.