Yep lm likening them more and more. I thought I was missing my roundwounds the other day. I put them back on for awhile. Then after an hour I took them off and put them back in the closet.
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
Why?They are very nice! Reasonably stiff, lively sounding, very versatile. I like them better than Chromes.
Yes, I designed these strings. They reason they sound more "modern" is that I wanted a set of flats that wasn't "too" thumpy. I was aiming for more clarity while still retaining the warmth of other flats.I have been experimenting with different flats. experimenting with different flats. I tried Labella’s and liked them a lot. I had a set of Chromes that were pretty good. I tried Roto Sound Jazz 77’s and I could not intornat the E strong so they came off right away. They sounded ok but I would not use them. I then bought a set of Fender flats and I have to say I like them as much as the Labella’s but in a different way. The Fenders are more modern sounding if that makes sense. I'd like to try EB cobalt flats next. BTW these were all installed on a Fender jazz bass.
Yes, I designed these strings. They reason they sound more "modern" is that I wanted a set of flats that wasn't "too" thumpy. I was aiming for more clarity while still retaining the warmth of other flats.
Fender flats are amazing in my experience. They feel very smooth and sound greatI'm looking for flats! And Fender has some out there that are noticeably less expensive than everyone else, even my personal favorite for rounds, Rotosound. Are they dreadful little pieces of metal, and that's why they're on the cheap, or are they just not expensive for some other unseen reason? I'm not picky at all with my flats, really, but I can tell when they absolutely suck, and when they sing. I know I'm not getting the best quality at this price point, but I don't mind. As long as I get that vibe, I can work with it.
Well I think you achieve your goal. The set i bought was 100-85-65-45. I wish I got the 105 E instead of the 100 but oh well next time.
Well I think you achieve your goal. The set i bought was 100-85-65-45. I wish I got the 105 E instead of the 100 but oh well next time.
Fender used to offer 9050CL (custom light) set, 45-60-80-105. That was the best balanced set.
They discontinued it, brought it back and discontinued it again.
I prefer 45-65-85-105 in most strings. I find it odd that D'addario doesn't make their Chromes in this gauge
I prefer 45-65-85-105 in most strings. I find it odd that D'addario doesn't make their Chromes in this gauge. They have lighter then it jumps to a heaver gauge with a 50 and 70 G and D string.
I personally have always preferred 45-60-80-105 over 45-65-85-105 for better balance in both tension and feel across all four strings.
[Invalid or Expired Link Removed]
I don't really care about the balance tentionI personally have always preferred 45-60-80-105 over 45-65-85-105 for better balance in both tension and feel across all four strings.
[Invalid or Expired Link Removed]
I like the 105 E because it's not floppy. I find with thicker strings I can go with lower action and the string is staying under my fingers and not floping around. To each his own.I don't care that much about balanced tension. I find that the 100 E string has plenty of punch even when the tension is lower, and I use the flappiness in my playing. I generally prefer .100 flats. The Ls are great, but I prefer the .065 and .085 D and A strings.
I don't care that much about balanced tension. I find that the 100 E string has plenty of punch even when the tension is lower, and I use the flappiness in my playing. I generally prefer .100 flats. The Ls are great, but I prefer the .065 and .085 D and A strings.
I like the 105 E because it's not floppy. I find with thicker strings I can go with lower action and the string is staying under my fingers and not floping around.
9050s didn't sound particularly good on my Jazz, nor did flats in general. The bass came alive when I stopped trying to use flats on it. Not necessarily true of all Jazzes, but true of this one.My experience tells me it all depends on the bass. The 9050CL (with .105) sounded better on my Jazz, while the 9050L (with .100) sounded better on my Precision.
I like the 105 E because it's not floppy. I find with thicker strings I can go with lower action and the string is staying under my fingers and not floping around. To each his own.
9050s didn't sound particularly good on my Jazz, nor did flats in general. The bass came alive when I stopped trying to use flats on it. Not necessarily true of all Jazzes, but true of this one.
Fender used to offer 9050CL (custom light) set, 45-60-80-105. That was the best balanced set.
They discontinued it, brought it back and discontinued it again.