Oh I'm sorry. I must have missed that part with my poor reading skills. Maybe you should point out where you wrote that the two cancelled gigs freed up the schedule to the point you wanted a previously refused gig back?!
You want to insult everyone for their poor reading skills and being stuck on the "money" but you're the one supplying all the details. So far you've done a pretty poor job of actually writing down the real issue.
Here, let me help:
Hey guys, I have an issue I would like some feedback on.
My band booked five gigs this spring in a thirty day period (May 15 - June 15). Now I have previously discussed with the band that I wanted to spend a little more time doing other things this year (camping, etc.) and I would be cutting back on my gigging schedule. Everyone understood and was fully onboard when I accepted two of the gigs and then found subs for the other three. Perfect, right?!
Well, as Murphy would have it, the two gigs I accepted have been cancelled. Out of the remaining three gigs I'm out of town for two but, I could do one of them. I do want to cut back on my gigging - but I don't want to quit completely! I'm thinking I'll contact the sub and tell him I don't need him any longer but I'll pay him for his time anyway if he can't pick up another gig in my "canceled" slot. (With a couple months notice he should be fine.)
Now here's the rub. When I first refused the gig I thought it was an exposure gig. As it turns out it is one of the best paying gigs this band has ever had! Just so you know, I don't gig for the money and I didn't turn this gig down because of the money but I'm afraid if I reschedule everything now it'll look like a money issue.
So what say you all? Do I take the gig back and appear to be a *hore (even though the sub doesn't stiffed) or do I just keep my trap shut and write it off to bad timing? Is there another tack I haven't considered?
There. Now go play in the snow.