• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

How big is the difference between 34" and 35" scale basses

So, I'm looking for a sixer and when I found a bass that I would maybe buy the fact that it's 35" puts me down. I've always been playing a 34" so my question is how big is the difference between 34" and 35"? Will it affect my technique? Is it harder to play?
I personally think that better B is just not such important factor to do the longer scale but most basses I've been looking are 35" since it's like a standard for 5 and 6 string basses.
 
Tried a 35 last week-end and, frankly, didn't make much difference. Maybe if you had really really short arms...but even then it's just an inch. And once you divide that inch by the number of frets, the difference in the space between frets is only a very tiny fraction of that inch, so maybe playing first position and going from first fret to fourth your pinky might fall short of ideal position, but for me I haven't really noticed.
 
Well, I play a 35" 6er and a 34" 4. I got used to it reasonably quickly, and in hindsight, I think that it was probably the 2 extra strings that caused the most initial awkwardness.

IMO, it's not too big an issue.

Also, if you poke around, there have been a few threads on TB about scale lengths and string tensions and all that jazz in case you were interested.
 
that B feels tighter,thats a true!
as for playing in general, if you dont know it's a 35' scale you wouldnt notest anything.

i know a guy,he swears he cant play 34 anymore after spending years with 35 but... sounds like BS to me,frankly.
 
I recieved a new bass yesterday and thats a 35" unlined fretless six string, i'm used to playin 34" fretted 5 strings. That extra inch is the least of my worries!! seriously though its not my fretting hand thats feeling the change its my right hand with the tighter strings thats feeling it the most. I'd say go for it though, if u like the way the bass looks and sounds and its a good price its a very minor hurdle to overcome.
 
Depending on how much you play, it might take about a week to adapt from 34 to 35. I found the biggest difference for me was over the first two frets. 35 DOES make a difference on the B string. As for tension, that depends on what brand name and gauge strings you use.

It does with some brands. Heh, we posted at the same time. My general rule of thumb is that a 35" scale bass will almost always have a stronger low B than a 34" scale bass. It certainly doesn't hurt the low B. A 34" scale bass can have a nice low B, but I haven't heard too many that aren't expensive. My friend Mike's Curbows are all 34" scale and have a mighty low B.

The 35" scale comes at a cost. Some simply can't do it. I'm only 5'6" and spend a LOT of time on 35" scale basses without any problems, BUT I need to be a lot more religious with good form or it's not comfortable.
 
I'm recovering from a spinal cord injury, and have had to use my 35" Peavey TL-5 while my 34" Alembic is laid up. HUGE DIFFERENCE. I know this is a special case, but reaching just a little more is killing me. By the way, the Peavey B is nowhere near the Alembic B!

Larry
 
I play a 35" 5 string and I love the added tension on the right hand-- and I play over the bridge pickup most of the time. It's really strengthened my right hand over the last 2 years and the response is amazing! It's also limbered up my left hand quite a bit-- I don't even notice the extra scale, and barely did when I bought it. Now my 34" Stingray feels like a toy, and honestly, I really dig what the 35" scale has done for my hands. It's all about what helps us grow, right?
 
I was very hesitant to go to 35" at first. It took me about two days (I practice four hours/day) to get used to it. Now I can transition back and forth without noticing. It's really not a problem at all if your technique is good, and 35" sounds better. By good technique, I mean classical guitar "proper" technique, like this:

http://www.talkbass.com/forum/showpost.php?p=4358024&postcount=47
http://www.talkbass.com/forum/showpost.php?p=4358068&postcount=50

from this thread:

http://www.talkbass.com/forum/showthread.php?t=342596&page=3

If you're really concerned, you can check out fanned-scale instruments, like Dingwall:

http://www.dingwallguitars.com/

There are a few bass-makers that really can make stellar 34" scale 5-strings (Mike Lull, Roger Sadowsky for example). It takes skill but it's certainly not impossible.
 
I'm recovering from a spinal cord injury, and have had to use my 35" Peavey TL-5 while my 34" Alembic is laid up. HUGE DIFFERENCE. I know this is a special case, but reaching just a little more is killing me. By the way, the Peavey B is nowhere near the Alembic B!

Larry

When was the TL-5 a 35" scale? I haven't seen 'em all, but the ones I saw had a 34" scale neck.

My Cirri have a nice low B, though I'm a bit partial to my Rob Allen MB2.
 
My guess is there are two main differences:
  1. Perception. If you start off with the assumption there will be a big difference, you'll very likely find a big difference.
  2. Balance. The balance in general, and where the upper end of the strap is in particular will mean a lot to how far away the nut is. That's probably a lot more significant than the miniscule increase in fret distance.