I can count the number of sentences you DIDN'T end with an exclamation mark on one hand.
And I can count the number of paragraphs used, also, on one hand.
This is nuts, regardless of the positives and/or negatives of the bridge. Timobee4, you rarely address the points put forward by experienced folk and respond with something which to THEM, is a little insulting.
Its smacks of someone learning theory saying, oh, you don't use b5's, they sound horrible, use MAJOR 3RDS!
Note, I'm not aligning b5's to the traditional bridge and M3rds to yours in any way. More someone who has discovered how great one easy option can sound using it to disregard something experienced folk can use to make something sound beautiful, albeit with more difficulty. It's imperfect, but hits home on SOME points at least.
I know you say that you didn't disregard the traditional setup, but people have politely posted showing the pitfalls of such a system and you have responded with 'no, but, MAJOR THIRDS!!!!!!!!!!'.
It's cool, I get that it may well be the best option in some cases, but you should take the advice of experienced luthiers and say 'yes, I know its not the best option but its easy and can sometimes really work in a pinch'. Rather than trying to defend some corner that, obscurely, you state yourself does not really exist, WHILE simultaneously spreading propoganda that it actually DOES exist (see DallasStrings' quote above).
Thankfully, I have a luthier near me, so I will never have to try this sort of bridge. In other situations, who knows? The trouble is I KNOW you are not a sales person but we are saturated with their B******T daily and are very wary of anyone trying to sell what may later transpire to be fairy gold. Anyone masquerading anything as even 10% better than the best known alternative is likely to be met with resistance for real reasons, the standard practice measurable throughout history is there for a reason.
The fundamentals of woodworking such an item as a bridge were explored many years ago, and I treat anything that goes against those standards with utmost scepticism. Progress is there to be made, but simple things like cutting an extra bit of wood out of a certain bit of a bridge is likely to have been explored centuries ago and evidently discounted. To recognize the advances in a craft(/art) you need to be aware of what sort of area to be looking for an advance IN, given the current technological stage of mankind. A bit of wood lost from a time honored shape is not such a case, we went through that stage years ago, when we get radical re-realisations based on newly discovered forces or properties, THEN I will be bothered enough to consider getting out my wallet, along with many others.
Until then, when such people who have learned from the previous generation of learners, who have learned from the previous generation of learners, who have.... etc approach the subject with a humble mind.
I'm a bit of a 'respect for knowledge' Nazi, and I apologize for that. But I think it's all we have as a race (hehe, getting very heavy!), extelligence is key. I hope this thread is closed soon!