I have a Carvin I bought back in 1992. It never had that... what's the word... mojo? Juju? I dunno, it's an ok instrument but it lacks character I guess. It also has a bridge that rattles and pickups that crackle and could never be fixed.
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
I heard the basses are really nice sounding and nicely made but I really don't think they are up to par with Sadowsky,Fodera,F Bass because if they were more folks would buy them. I think only selling direct has something to do with it also and if you want work done on your Carvin amp it's going back to California for work and in your profile I don't see a Carvin bass?.
I was going to get a Carvin but my desire for a Modulus neck got the best of me.
This thread is very silly and pointless.
I think a better question would be 'why don't more folks play Carvins?
I think there's a stigma attached to them. I do believe they make fine instruments. I know in the past their electronics left much to be desired but I think that has been solved now. I plan to own a SB4000 or SB5000 one of these days.
They may have a lot of cosmetic options, but you are limited to just a handful of pickups/preamps. Plus, I think they are kind of ugly. Not a fan of the bodies or headstock shapes.
who also cuts out the middle man which means lower prices for the consumer.
First off, there' s no such thing as a Carvin P bass.
The same reason some like the color red and some don't
