• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

How do bad singers get away with sounding good?

It's not my opinion. At least not all the time.
I saw several bands with perfect vocals and perfect instrumentals, not a flaw and it's good, it's better!
For example: Clutch! This man can sing and put on a good show.

Counter example: Foo Fighter.... I love Dave Grohl but he shaged up the lead vocal by screaming all the way.
I think you’re missing the point of this thread. A singer’s role is to sell a song, convey whatever message, feeling, mood, or emotion there is in the lyric (unfortunately there’s not a whole lot of substance in many song lyrics, but that’s a different discussion for a different time).

Often, just like the perfect actor cast for a unusual role, a singer with some kind of limitation can put the song across in an equally perfect manner, especially if the lyrics/song is theirs. If not, a particular vocalist’s idiosyncratic style brings a new interpretation. Perfection can be boring, bland, and superficial.

No matter what she was singing, even if it was an upbeat tune, Billie Holliday always brought the sound of a heart broken into a million pieces and a world weariness with her slippery upper pitch. Joy Division’s Ian Curtis communicated a private sense of dread and frustration that ironically millions could relate to, but unfortunately it became too real for him. Lou Reed’s monotone was street-wise and cynical, yet on a song like “The Bed”, that(plus the way his voice cracks on the high notes)paints a portrait of a person in shell-shock, denial, and resignation over the suicide of his partner, who already dragged him through a living hell, yet he’s still somewhat wistful about her. Lastly, for impending doom and despair, you don’t need any downtuned band, but instead absorb the whispered suboctave drone of Leonard Cohen. You want it darker? He’s your man.
 
Last edited:
You'd be suprised how many people can't tell what's in tune and what isn't. And if the music is busy enough, or distracting enough, then a lot of people don't care how good the singer is.
At best people will notice that it sounds sort of wrong, but even then, many might just think that's part of the music.
 
There's 3 kinds of singers IME: good ones, bad ones who manage to discover/develop a cool shtick (or little set of them), and plain bad singers. I've only ever sang lead for HC punk stuff, still do occasionally, so I'm at the very bottom of this hierarchy 95% of the time, I rarely not suck.

I'm a Geddy Lee fan, (particularly the Presto -> Test for echo period of singing). I'm a Björk AND Johhny Rotten AND Greg Graffin fan. So I'd confidently say I'm VERY OK with bad singers, as long as they offer their own cool sounding AND/OR touching thing. I appreciate the merit even if I don't like the final result of the vocals, as is the case with Anthony Kiedis (who, as we all know, can't sing).
 
We are around and influenced by the human voice literally our whole lives. We are evolutionarily primed to Pay attention and lend significance to language and the human voice.. for most people, music is not purely the art of sound, and singers in many context are actually a vehicle of humanity In ways that elevate it above the level of just another instrument in a pretty wide scope of context.

By using the human voice, all of the things that make us adore a friend, or lock us onto a movie character, or give us goosebumps when we hear a speech; or make our heart drop when a loved one talks to us.. all of these things are put into play with the voice in music.
 
Neil Young - Great songwriter
Lol, this was the first singer that came to mind. His singing, not to mention his guitar work, is lacking technically, but everything fits and there are a few songs of his that really stir my emotions. I'm glad I got to see him a couple of times with Crazy Horse, including the "Rust Never Sleeps" tour at the Cow Palace in 1978. That's where the movie was filmed. Just one big cheezy presentation, but it was sooooo cool back then!
 
How do bad singers get away with sounding good?

With decades of musical experience behind me, I've noticed that there are some well respected singers who aren't technically good singers, but are often credited with having voices that are pleasant. Often, they're described as being "charismatic".

What's the explanation for that?
Singer popularity is a weird thing. Doesn't seem to necessarily correlate to vocal talent in a lot of cases. Being a great singer is different than being a singer people actually want to listen to.

In the 90s, my fledgling original band had a singer who the audience just loved. But he had serious pitch issues. Our small but loyal fanbase didn't care. But the record company did. So at their behest ("this project goes no further with that singer") we replaced him for a guy who was technically way better. The recordings sounded great. But when we played out, nobody wanted it. People said we should have kept the original singer. :/
 
A few years ago I listened to some of a Maroon 5 concert that Sirius livecast. Adam Levine sounded horrible.

Weeks later I actually saw them at a festival in Aspen. Levine sounded great.

I’ve been trying to figure how much the experience of being there live affected my perception, whether Levine was having an epic bad night the first time, or both.
 
  • Like
Reactions: FRoss6788
A lot of singers have a note or two near the top of their range that has that character - they're straining to get it out, it sounds so good somehow, and it connects you to them - their effort is so compelling. Sting has an entire octave in his range that sounds like that. Which is kinda unfair....
Article I read was written as a report on a scientific study rather than one aimed at musicians. But, as well as struggling for some notes, they specifically mentioned tenors. Which could feed into the top of some men's range. Never studied Stings vocal range, but plenty of examples of his voice starting to crack up high.
 
It is subjective to what you like or what you want to hear.

I think Delta blues singers are amazing but some of the older guys smoked a lot and you can hear it but it added a flair to their voice.

A lot of people say Kevin Parker from Tame Impala isn't a good singer, but he's extremely successful. I would say it is passion for songwriting and for singing a song with your heart and making it fit your sound.

My Bloody Valentine, weird vocals, sounds good to me but to someone else is it good? Cannibal Corpse, amazing things you can do with your voice but to most people is that enjoyable?

Again though it is so subjective to me this idea of a "Bad singer"

But unless Yoko is brought up... MAYBE we can debate that.
 
I’ve played live with a great vocalist who is anything but a front man. A combination great for studio recordings but an audience doesn’t want an energy vampire.

I’ve also played live with a good but not great vocalist who is a great front man and very engaging with the audience. Given the choice at a live performance I prefer the one who engages the audience and gives them a great experience. YMMV
 
Lead singers are frontpersons - their job is to put on a good show. It's charisma. Mick Jagger has been doing it for over half a century.
I think it’s a difference of having good pitch versus having good vocal character. They don’t always over lap. For example, I can sing pretty much in key with a broad register, but don’t necessarily have a good voice for lead vocals. Also, I’m about as charismatic and lively on stage as Bill Wyman :-)