TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
That sounds more like "you don't need to buy an expensive carved bass in order to get a good sound and a playable instrument". Which is a lot different than "plywood basses are better than carved basses, which are all headaches except for the ones Ken Smith can afford."matt macgown said:Economics has a lot to do with it. Especially with kids, though not for everyone is that a factor. Care of it is the biggest concern - a fellow or girl - fellow with a fancy bass has a hefty responsibility, and lots of bass players of my aquaintance are all that well heeled. Only a few.
But you've cooked on bass, right? And if the humidity was too high, it was hard to get a good sound out of the wife...HERE ANDGONEAGAIN said:Basses and wives - may be a bad comparison. I never had a bass that could cook. Or, come to think of it, a wife that could, either.
matt macgown said:Oh, I see what w' mean - no Mrs. SmackGinty went the way of most Kays - held up for 20 years plus a little, then give out. Found 'er someone more resonnsible. That'd be about twenty year ago, I could've had another Kay run it's cycle by now.
Butch 'y know, I come from a sorta de-pauperate environment, off up in the Maine woods just a little south of Patch Mountain, and there weren't hardly much of anything up there fer comparison, except a feller named Dwight Emery, and he run off to the city - Honolulu, I think it were, to play in that symphony over there. Short o' that, bass pickers were a rare breed in the 50s. Oh, I played fer a few folks since, but likely no one you ever heard of. So y' can't take me too seriously, least wise I never did, nor did she.
simandlhandle said:jneuman said:Unfortunately, Kay C-1's are a dime a dozen here in the States. Maybe it's different in the UK.
Yes, I've only seen 3 here. 2 belonged to visiting players, and one was in a dealers . They all sounded loud and deep. I notice that Harvie S is playing a Kay now as well, and I remember Arnold Schnitzer saying that Eddie Gomez did a lot of playing on a Kay that he restored. Maybe they are the 5 good ones that Kay made, or maybe there is a 6th?
Looking back at past threads, I see that most people seem to agree with you though. Maybe you have to look at a lot of oysters to find a pearl?
Don't get me wrong...I love my Kay. The sound is big and works well for Jazz and it's only a '64 - no big deal. I even played mine with compliments in my local community symphony for years. I'ts just that since they were mass produced, they really arn't worth getting fussy over. I wish someone would do a definitive study of what makes the older ones so much better though.
Jon
Ed Fuqua said:That sounds more like "you don't need to buy an expensive carved bass in order to get a good sound and a playable instrument". Which is a lot different than "plywood basses are better than carved basses, which are all headaches except for the ones Ken Smith can afford."
I can certainly agree with the first statement, the second all I have to do to prove it wrong is pick up my curent bass.
simandlhandle said:Every Kay that I have played over here in London has been good. Just because the front is done in doesn't mean that the bass is " firewood". Don't ruin a potentialy good instrument. Unless you are very adept at instrument building; or are prepared to do courses to get good; or can get a luthier to take you on as an apprentice.... well... get a real luthier,Arnold Schnitzer,Bob Brandsetter etc to make you a new front. They like working on good instruments, admitedly not for free, but you obviously haven't yet realised how hard it is to get a good instrument. If you want to get into luthiery , ok , but I get the feeling you want to do it on the cheap. What you are attempting is a hard thing to do; it is a harder thing to do cheaply.
Just my experience, as I am at present having a new front put on one of my basses.
ba$$88 said:Just don't expect to play concertos with them.
- jneuman
think I got lucky with my Kay. I bought it for 500 bucks, but invested some work on it. I played the Dragonetti concerto with full orchestra on my Kay.
Is this my bass you are asking about? OK. Its my big old German bass , which has 43 1/4 inch stop. The front was a bit bowed in when I bought it, but a luthier told me it was stable enough. It sounded great and I bought it, and it was fine for about 14 years. Anyway, it recently got a big crack up the bass bar, the lower front cracked across, as well as parrallel ,to the bass bar. The bow got quite a bit deeper. I slackened the strings off and took it to a luthier for assesment. We eventually decided to take the front off, and the part of the front between the bridge and the bottom saddle, had been thinned down to 2mm. It would need a lot of work; a massive patch ; a new bass bar? The quote for repair was more than his quote for a new front. Even if repaired it wouldn't feel or sound the same as it had, and probably wouldn't be very robust , compared to a new front. Also it was probably thinned down because it didn't sound so good, so a new front should improve it.Jeff Bollbach said:Interesting that you need a new table-I'm wondering what would precipitate such drastic action?
ba$$88 said:Yeah I have the same opinion. My Kay lacks a little past thumb. How old is your Kay? I'm always interested to hear how people come across old basses.