Revsound RS28V for home/small gigs.
Revsound RS212 (or similar) for larger gigs.
Head of your choice.
Revsound RS212 (or similar) for larger gigs.
Head of your choice.
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

OP, I'm here just to tell you that your username reminds me of a Mexican dish I get once in a while at Don Ramon.
View attachment 7002153
![]()
It's the cheese in the dish, right?Dang it jeff, you always seem to post food right when my late night munchkins are setting in!

100% get the MB212ii.I've been playing casually for a couple of years using a Rumble 25. I'm taking things a bit more seriously lately and decided it's time for an upgrade. Although I quite like the tone I've dialed in on my budget setup, I've been told I haven't heard my bass yet because the 8" speaker on the Rumble 25 doesn't cut it for lower frequencies. I feel like a very minor upgrade to a 40 might be underwhelming. I was hoping to purchase something with an obvious tonal improvement. I felt maybe moving away from Fender might also make the upgrade more worthwhile. I worry spending a significant amount on a Rumble 500-800 just to sound very similar to the 25 would be a bit of a downer (is there a significant tonal improvement between these models beyond improved bass and volume? Excuse my naivety).
After some research, I think I'm leaning towards something Gallien-Krueger. For simplicity, I was going to stick with a combo. I've had my eye on the MB 210 or 212 V2's. They are a fair bit pricier than even a Fender Rumble 800W combo where I'm from, but my heroes use GK (albeit 2001RB heads) and I like the tones I've heard. However, I imagine I'll usually only ever need a fraction of that power in the foreseeable future. I usually only play with a guitarist playing through a 100W Katana, which is never turned up too loud anyway. I typically play with the volume around 9 o'clock on the Rumble 25. I have no immediate plans on gigging.
Would purchasing a 500W GK be an absolute waste, or can I expect the tonal improvements to be very noticable even playing at very low volume on a GK combo? I hear that even many solid-state amps won't sound particuarly good until they've reached a minimum volume threshold, but I have no idea how true this is. Would a GK 112 v2 200W be a smarter investment? I just read it doesn't have a horn, so I figured the 210 or 212 would sound better along with the two speakers. I just don't know if I'll be able to hear the difference at the volumes I'd be playing at.
I'd appreciate your thoughts and suggestions!
Welcome aboard!I posted this, my first post here at TB, before bed last night hoping for one or two replies. Haven't had the chance to read through everything, but I'm super appreciative of all the replies and suggestions and will have a good read through soon. Thanks all!

If you can’t get by with say 100 watts driving a good efficient cab in a bedroom, I can’t help you. That said, it’s not going to be the same experience as say 800 watts driving multiple cabs on a stage standing about 15’ from it.I've been playing casually for a couple of years using a Rumble 25. I'm taking things a bit more seriously lately and decided it's time for an upgrade. Although I quite like the tone I've dialed in on my budget setup, I've been told I haven't heard my bass yet because the 8" speaker on the Rumble 25 doesn't cut it for lower frequencies. I feel like a very minor upgrade to a 40 might be underwhelming. I was hoping to purchase something with an obvious tonal improvement. I felt maybe moving away from Fender might also make the upgrade more worthwhile. I worry spending a significant amount on a Rumble 500-800 just to sound very similar to the 25 would be a bit of a downer (is there a significant tonal improvement between these models beyond improved bass and volume? Excuse my naivety).
After some research, I think I'm leaning towards something Gallien-Krueger. For simplicity, I was going to stick with a combo. I've had my eye on the MB 210 or 212 V2's. They are a fair bit pricier than even a Fender Rumble 800W combo where I'm from, but my heroes use GK (albeit 2001RB heads) and I like the tones I've heard. However, I imagine I'll usually only ever need a fraction of that power in the foreseeable future. I usually only play with a guitarist playing through a 100W Katana, which is never turned up too loud anyway. I typically play with the volume around 9 o'clock on the Rumble 25. I have no immediate plans on gigging.
Would purchasing a 500W GK be an absolute waste, or can I expect the tonal improvements to be very noticable even playing at very low volume on a GK combo? I hear that even many solid-state amps won't sound particuarly good until they've reached a minimum volume threshold, but I have no idea how true this is. Would a GK 112 v2 200W be a smarter investment? I just read it doesn't have a horn, so I figured the 210 or 212 would sound better along with the two speakers. I just don't know if I'll be able to hear the difference at the volumes I'd be playing at.
I'd appreciate your thoughts and suggesti
I've been playing casually for a couple of years using a Rumble 25. I'm taking things a bit more seriously lately and decided it's time for an upgrade. Although I quite like the tone I've dialed in on my budget setup, I've been told I haven't heard my bass yet because the 8" speaker on the Rumble 25 doesn't cut it for lower frequencies. I feel like a very minor upgrade to a 40 might be underwhelming. I was hoping to purchase something with an obvious tonal improvement. I felt maybe moving away from Fender might also make the upgrade more worthwhile. I worry spending a significant amount on a Rumble 500-800 just to sound very similar to the 25 would be a bit of a downer (is there a significant tonal improvement between these models beyond improved bass and volume? Excuse my naivety).
After some research, I think I'm leaning towards something Gallien-Krueger. For simplicity, I was going to stick with a combo. I've had my eye on the MB 210 or 212 V2's. They are a fair bit pricier than even a Fender Rumble 800W combo where I'm from, but my heroes use GK (albeit 2001RB heads) and I like the tones I've heard. However, I imagine I'll usually only ever need a fraction of that power in the foreseeable future. I usually only play with a guitarist playing through a 100W Katana, which is never turned up too loud anyway. I typically play with the volume around 9 o'clock on the Rumble 25. I have no immediate plans on gigging.
Would purchasing a 500W GK be an absolute waste, or can I expect the tonal improvements to be very noticable even playing at very low volume on a GK combo? I hear that even many solid-state amps won't sound particuarly good until they've reached a minimum volume threshold, but I have no idea how true this is. Would a GK 112 v2 200W be a smarter investment? I just read it doesn't have a horn, so I figured the 210 or 212 would sound better along with the two speakers. I just don't know if I'll be able to hear the difference at the volumes I'd be playing at.
I'd appreciate your thoughts and suggestions!
I tried something similar last week - de-boned/shredded a store-bought roasted chicken, added a can of whole black beans, stuffed that into flour tortillas, and topped with a can of Hot red enchilada sauce and LOTS of cheese. Easy to make and was better than I expected:OP, I'm here just to tell you that your username reminds me of a Mexican dish I get once in a while at Don Ramon.
View attachment 7002153
![]()

I posted this, my first post here at TB, before bed last night hoping for one or two replies. Haven't had the chance to read through everything, but I'm super appreciative of all the replies and suggestions and will have a good read through soon. Thanks all!