How would I react?
I would start practicing upright, that's how.
I would start practicing upright, that's how.
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
A singer friend of mine posted this the other day on FB and it seems to fit: "When you complain, you make yourself a victim. Leave the situation, change the situation, or accept it. All else is madness." - Eckhart TolleI'm not standing for it.
One risk is that if I cut him loose, he could start going after all my clients and that could cause drama. I have a lot of them, and he knows the pay rates. And i already take a cut off the top before paying the musicians, but I encourage them to do the same as they too need to be compensated for all the rejection and hassles involved in arranging and being responsible for gigs.
This has been a good discussion. Some of the comments are a bit off, not recognizing the political environment that prevails when you have musicians playing the same bands, to the same kinds of clients, with the same kind of music. But the discussion has helped me see the issues.
I am considering using him for my existing clients that know him so at least he doesn't go after them. He likes to play with me, and never refuses gigs, and I keep him busy enough, so that approach would not disturb anything. Keep your friends close and your potential enemies closer as they say.
New gigs go to a different drummer. If he asks me about it, I'll mention his group, their professional video, his booking at local music festivals not offerred to me, and let him know that I've decided to move forward on a different model. I won't have 1st, 2nd and 3rd call musicians, I will call musicians as I see fit. And that I am more than willing to throw more gigs his way provided he reciprocates. In the meantime, he can take a reduced gigging schedule. I will only bring it up if he does so there is no drama.
And while you're at it, consider adding to your arsenal of skills and pickup upright bass. It can only add to your reputation. It's precisely what I did when called years ago for a local prominent bluegrass band. Sure, they were content to have me on electric only, but to me that does not fit the genre. So I did what I had to do to make myself more marketable. And being able to play upright has helped me keep jobs as well as get certain jobs sight unseen (no audition).
...I have one question - what about an electric upright bass? Does that carry weight in getting gigs? Or is it essential to play a big acoustic bass? I already haul a ton of stuff for some gigs, and to add the upright bass to the mix is going to be a really hassle.
I'm surprised he even asked you. People don't have to get your permission to take other gigs. You may consider it bad form, but that's the way it goes. And I've been in the position of people snaking gigs you introduced them to before, and there's really not much you can do.I'm an active local musician/electric bass player and I have a group of musicians I call in 1st, 2nd, and 3rd order for gigs. I have a drummer who is first call. I bring him a lot of gigs, judging by the size of his 1099 at the end of the year.
Anyway, he called me a while ago asking if I would mind if for a couple gigs at a restaurant not far from him, if he could use our piano player (2nd call guy) and a string bass player for the gig. His reason for this was the owner "wants string bass" and I'm an electric player. I said fine, but indicated that if I was going to call him first for all the gigs I have, I'm expecting to be part of the gigs if the instrumentation is the same (piano, bass, drums) that he books.
Personally, it irks me when I bring musicians a lot of work, find the musicians, arrange the rehearsals, get everyone music, and then they go off on their own, when there are no apparent interpersonal skill or other problems. I also think the owners' string bass requirement was hokus.
I later see all over the Internet that he has named the trio, and gotten a professional video done. He is listed as the contact for this group, and they are doing music festivals around town.
How would you proceed with this case?
I am planning to do this. I have wanted to play upright for years. I realized recently it was so hard because the basses in the stores aren't set up properly. I played one that was set up properly and it was relatively easy. So, I think that with the right set up I could learn it pretty quickly.
I have one question - what about an electric upright bass? Does that carry weight in getting gigs? Or is it essential to play a big acoustic bass? I already haul a ton of stuff for some gigs, and to add the upright bass to the mix is going to be a really hassle.
I'm surprised he even asked you. People don't have to get your permission to take other gigs. You may consider it bad form, but that's the way it goes. And I've been in the position of people snaking gigs you introduced them to before, and there's really not much you can do.
There are other drummers I prefer more too, but I made a commitment to him as first call for a host of reasons, and he knew that I was expecting him to reciprocate with gigs when he has them.
He told me that after they played together it would be "just for fun" after that. Sounds like it's not just for fun anymore if they have it all over the Internet.
I am thinking of moving him off the first call chair after I talk to him and get an unsatisfactory answer. We are all at different levels.
But I think it's politically unwise to cut the guy out of paid work (me) who gives him the lion's share of his music income.
No offense, but all this retaliation/retribution talk makes you sound petty and unhinged. You sound like you own these guys, but you don't.
What's the point in asking us how we would react if you're going to get defensive when we wouldn't react the way you want us to? If the way you communicate on the internet is a reflection of how you are in the real world, I wouldn't wanna work with you either.What I am about to say does not bear on the current situation, but on gig sharks in general -- people who are in your band, start their own band, and then low ball all your clients, take the musicians you put together, and create headaches for your pocket book.
I think there is a ton you can do. I am of the mind you have to prevent people from ruining all your hard work, stealing the clients you found, making the musicians you oriented unavailable for your own gigs, incurring extra rehearsals with subs (and the quality problems that often results), -- all that is blood sweat and tears and it needs to be "defended" against competition - particularly from people who you trusted wtih all the inside information by giving them the priviledge of getting paid and being part of your project. If you wan to respond to these kinds of things -- when there is outright gig-sharing you can do the following. I have never done it before, but if I had blatant gig sharking by someone in one of the bands I formed, I would do this.
a) Go after the gig sharker's clients until he sees the wisdom of leaving yours alone. Make sure he knows that's why you did it.
b) Poach his musicians for better paying gigs. Make sue he knows the only reason that is happening is because he is gig sharking your clients.
c) Shut him out of all future gigs with the band.
All with the clear communication this is happening because he is taking advantage of your hard work, reducing your gig schedule, diluting the pay in the market, and causing you extra rehearsal. You can use it as a conversation piece to figure out what might need to change in the original band that prompted the guy to go out on his own in the first place. It means there should have been communication earlier on to figure out what prompted the guy to off on their own.
The other thing I have done is up my marketing efforts to find new clients, Keep your own musicians so busy they don't have time for other bands or for going after your clients.