Can we get off the Donna Lee thing, please?
Yup - I agree, there are loads of other tunes/pieces we could be discussing in this context, as I have been trying to say!
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
Can we get off the Donna Lee thing, please?
Can we get off the Donna Lee thing, please? The point is being missing completely. I think this post has the potential of being a really constructive discussion on improving your reading proficiency, but you're going to wear out everyone's patience by harping on one tune.
No worries, mates. I get fixated on things a lot too.
I have a question: how do you improve your ability to read 16th note patterns with rests, etc? I'm sensing the whole reading thing has to do with recognizing and knowing common patterns, especially when it's the same style of music. I'm trying to improve as far as being a funk/r&b type player. Any suggestions?
No worries, mates. I get fixated on things a lot too.
I have a question: how do you improve your ability to read 16th note patterns with rests, etc? I'm sensing the whole reading thing has to do with recognizing and knowing common patterns, especially when it's the same style of music. I'm trying to improve as far as being a funk/r&b type player. Any suggestions?
Ehh, F, just.
I've looked into it a little, and can figure out a line using it, on my own time, but not easily.
I would like to study it propperly.

).Working through unfamiliar charts with a metronome or click works well here - start slow, speed up. But don't spend so long on one piece that you get to know it so well that you're no longer reading it.
I did a rehearsal yesterday where we played a new chart - "What is Hip?" by Tower of Power. Here's the bass part (what I got given wasn't exactly the same as this, but very similar).
http://www.lucaspickford.com/tranship.htm
No way would I have read that on sight! I got given the part last week and I reckon it took me 3-4 hours of solid practice at it before I'd nailed it. It went well at rehearsal, anyway. Phew...
How does 3-4 hours sound to you guys who are "A" grade readers? Not all of that time was working out the dots, of course. I had to get the chops together as well, it's not easy to play (not for me anyway).
Ehh, F, just.
I've looked into it a little, and can figure out a line using it, on my own time, but not easily.
I would like to study it propperly.

AND... sigged. Thank you, Sir, marvellously expressive use of the language.If reading ability was gasoline, I wouldn't have enough to drive a pissant's go kart around a cheerio.
Wow - I'd be impressed in that case. For the reading, and also the technique. It's a tricky little number.Interesting example. I looked at the Pickford transcription you cited, and I'm (humbly, I swear!) confident I could nail that in one take
...BUT, that's because I've heard the tune "What Is Hip?" a million times and I'm reasonably familiar with how the bass part is supposed to go. So strictly speaking I'm not sure you'd call what I'd be doing "sight reading". (Although I'd certainly have my nose buried in the chart & would be 100% clueless if you took it away mid-tune, so I wouldn't just be playing from memory.)
If you whipped out an original chart in the style of "What Is Hip?" with similar phrases & figures but that was decidedly different from the ToP tune, my humble confidence would definitely drop. I'm definitely not an "A" grade reader in that sense!