I could be waaaayyyy off, but I always figured that some of the budget basses use more peices because they cut the usable wood from a bad board, hence, more cuts=more peices. Anyone know if there is any truth to this?
\.)
I'm thinking it might have more to do with the trees actually. I've heard that there are fewer and fewer big tonewood trees to cut down (or that can be cut down). I don't know much about alders in the wild, but, you'd need one like 16 inches in diameter to get a one piece bass body out of it, and you could only get it from the middle. OTOH, you can cut 2-3-4 and more piece basses from smaller diameter trees, and from around the one piece body on the bigger one. FWIW, I 've never noticed much tonal difference based on number of pieces. It is more of an aesthetic concern, and then only on translucents. I've got an old MIJ P copy in Ash and you can barely see where they joints are (I can't even remeber if it is 2 or 3 pieces) . I've seen some fenders, however, where the grain didn't match very well. The best sounding MIM I've played (Better than some MIAs to my ears) was ash and translucent, and had the worst matched 3 piece body I've ever seen (one of the 3 pieces had essentially no grain, and the other two were basically oriented upside down from what would have looked right). OTOH, I've seen MIAs that were nearly as bad.