I posted a couple weeks ago about how my rig was really underwhelming me with the volume it was producing. I had a rack setup with a Crown XLS 602 pushing a stack of a 2x12 and 2x10 Avatar cabs.
I ditched the rack setup and picked up a Carvin B1500. I still have the same problems I did with the rack setup: very unimpressive volume, and when I turn it up the amp starts clipping and goes into protect mode. That's happening with the drive about noon, volume around 5, and bass & sub bass both set just a bit above unity for a little boost. The cones in the cab are moving like crazy, but just not giving much oomph. I tried running the amp through each cab separately to ensure it wasn't a phase issue - that didn't help at all.
We ran my friend's 100w plexi Marshall through the avatar cabs and got the same result: tons of movement on the cones and mucho excursion, but very, very underwhelming volume. A fuzz pedal through his quad reverb Fender amp on about 3 was drowning out the bass.
We ran bass through the plexi and into two 4x12 guitar cabs and got at least as much volume as the supposedly 1600w carvin setup provided. That is messed up and insane.
Now, having tried more than one amp through the avatar cabs and gotten the same crappy result, I'm thinking the problem is the cabs. This makes no sense to me though - I've never heard a bad word about the avatar neo cabs, and CERTAINLY never heard that they are crazy inefficient. There are a couple cabs on CL here locally (old Sunn 2x15, Ampeg 6x10, Schroeder 21012) that I'd like to try out with the carvin amp, if at least just to see whether my cabs are the problem.
Considering how nice the 100w plexi sounded, part of me is thinking I ought to just bite the bullet and get an SVT. I'm not a diehard tube guy, but it sure seems like a strike against SS when a 100w guitar amp can match a monster 1600w SS amp in terms of volume.
I ditched the rack setup and picked up a Carvin B1500. I still have the same problems I did with the rack setup: very unimpressive volume, and when I turn it up the amp starts clipping and goes into protect mode. That's happening with the drive about noon, volume around 5, and bass & sub bass both set just a bit above unity for a little boost. The cones in the cab are moving like crazy, but just not giving much oomph. I tried running the amp through each cab separately to ensure it wasn't a phase issue - that didn't help at all.
We ran my friend's 100w plexi Marshall through the avatar cabs and got the same result: tons of movement on the cones and mucho excursion, but very, very underwhelming volume. A fuzz pedal through his quad reverb Fender amp on about 3 was drowning out the bass.
We ran bass through the plexi and into two 4x12 guitar cabs and got at least as much volume as the supposedly 1600w carvin setup provided. That is messed up and insane.
Now, having tried more than one amp through the avatar cabs and gotten the same crappy result, I'm thinking the problem is the cabs. This makes no sense to me though - I've never heard a bad word about the avatar neo cabs, and CERTAINLY never heard that they are crazy inefficient. There are a couple cabs on CL here locally (old Sunn 2x15, Ampeg 6x10, Schroeder 21012) that I'd like to try out with the carvin amp, if at least just to see whether my cabs are the problem.
Considering how nice the 100w plexi sounded, part of me is thinking I ought to just bite the bullet and get an SVT. I'm not a diehard tube guy, but it sure seems like a strike against SS when a 100w guitar amp can match a monster 1600w SS amp in terms of volume.