TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
I just go try some basses...then I find one I like...then if its in my price range I buy it...then I play it.
I *might* pop out the phone to check some reviews first, though usually not.
I didn't know things were so complicated.![]()
Agreed. I wouldn't buy a new bass without playing it. I've also found that, no matter what year of Fender, if there are 10 fenders on a wall, one will be better than the others (and one will also be worse). These are mass produced products. You are NOT getting a hand-crafted, lovingly built instrument like a Fodera, NYC Sadowsky or Rob Allen. You are also not paying that kind of money. You want a piece of real craftsmanship? Be prepared to PAY - and like it.
Fender has a custom shop for hand-crafted, lovingly built instruments like Fodera, Sadowsky, etc.
And, you pay for it.
The OP's gripe is about paying too much for a new Fender, so let's look at the real numbers.
My first Fender J was bought new, at Apex Music of San Diego for $350 at the end of 1976 (Xmas present for 15 year old me). I got a job when it turned 16 in 1977 making $2.65 per hour.
Using this inflation calculator:
http://data.bls.gov/cgi-bin/cpicalc.pl?cost1=350&year1=1977&year2=2014
that $350 tranlates into $1356 in 2014 bucks. And do you know how much Sweetwater is selling a new American Standard J bass for? $1349. And I assure you, a 2014 Fender American Standard bass is a nicer instrument than a 1977.
Oh, and my minimum wage of $2.65, using that same calculator, is $10.27 in today's bucks (for what that's worth)
I am Soma,
Dead spots, shielding issues, ski jump necks etc. are not "opinions", but other than that, yes it is theoritically possible that I managed to pick up X amount of Japanese basses, where every one is better than the best one of the Y number MIA basses I have picked up.
In real life, most of us use collected experiences to build opinions since we can not sample a whole production. If japanese consumer electronics, cars and motor bikes etc are all in general far ahead American ad European brands, why would not their basses also be?
I think you are confused as to the definition of "opinion" is. You could find just as many people who have had great experiences. You could find people that dig the basses you did not. Even with cars, motor bikes, etc you are speaking of your opinion.
No, not really an opinion regarding the cars. In Sweden there is a yearly, mandatory "federal" vehicle inspection. It covers checks related to safety, structural integrety, emissions etc. (Very similar to the German inspection.) The results are public, listed per brand and model, and down to the point where anyone can go to these federal inspection sites to request the protocol for a specific car.
What cars are in the top? It sure is not anÿ American ones...
And one of our biggest insurance companies publish a regular report where they list the different brands and models and how they fare in terms of insurance covered mechanical repairs. After the warranty expires, their insurance will cover costs for air conditioning, transmission, engine, electronical modules etc up to 100 000 km.
What cars have least problems, from the top?
Toyota
Kia
Mitsubishi
Subaru
Hyundai
Honda
Lexus
Chevrolet (the ones sold here are mainly Korean models)
The worst cars:
BMW
Land Rover
Chrysler
Mini
JEEP
Porsche
MCC/Smart
Alfa Romeo
Cadillac
Rover (the worst one)
See a pattern?
And as a former employee for Mercedes Benz / Chrysler and BMW, I can only confirm the above findings, but on a more anecdotal level.
Want motorbike data? Check out the german Magazine Motorrad, and their "dauertest", where they own and run the bikes for 50 000 km, strip them down and measure all critical wear, which is then reported along with a full maintenance history. They have (as far as I know) ONE Harley competing in high position. The rest is mainly Japanese bikes. The bottom half is full of European "premium", "over engineered" bikes.
So while maintaining affordability, many Asian brands still deliver superior reliability and performance. Accept it.
No, not really an opinion regarding the cars. In Sweden there is a yearly, mandatory "federal" vehicle inspection. It covers checks related to safety, structural integrety, emissions etc. (Very similar to the German inspection.) The results are public, listed per brand and model, and down to the point where anyone can go to these federal inspection sites to request the protocol for a specific car.
What cars are in the top? It sure is not anÿ American ones...
And one of our biggest insurance companies publish a regular report where they list the different brands and models and how they fare in terms of insurance covered mechanical repairs. After the warranty expires, their insurance will cover costs for air conditioning, transmission, engine, electronical modules etc up to 100 000 km.
What cars have least problems, from the top?
Toyota
Kia
Mitsubishi
Subaru
Hyundai
Honda
Lexus
Chevrolet (the ones sold here are mainly Korean models)
The worst cars:
BMW
Land Rover
Chrysler
Mini
JEEP
Porsche
MCC/Smart
Alfa Romeo
Cadillac
Rover (the worst one)
See a pattern?
And as a former employee for Mercedes Benz / Chrysler and BMW, I can only confirm the above findings, but on a more anecdotal level.
Want motorbike data? Check out the german Magazine Motorrad, and their "dauertest", where they own and run the bikes for 50 000 km, strip them down and measure all critical wear, which is then reported along with a full maintenance history. They have (as far as I know) ONE Harley competing in high position. The rest is mainly Japanese bikes. The bottom half is full of European "premium", "over engineered" bikes.
So while maintaining affordability, many Asian brands still deliver superior reliability and performance. Accept it.