So I went to a guitar store today and played both the SR500 and the Sterling Sub Ray 4. The 500 is $600 and the Sterling is $300. Literally half the price of the Ibanez. I am a guitar player not a bass player but I can hear tone and know what sounds good. The following is my opinion but I would like to hear if I am either right on or completely missing something.
First of the Sterling seems like it was double the weight as the 500 but it also did not feel like it was a toy guitar which the 500 can feel like because it is so light. The 500 had a smaller neck but not so much smaller that it is a deal breaker. The Sterling has a great finish on it and the 500 had that typical chipped stain that everyone complains about. Looking at just the finish, the idea of paying double the amount for a guitar that is known for a bad finish seems a little nuts. I understand it's just cosmetics but how the guitar is going to look in a year is also important especially if you are ever going to sell it. The 500 has more tone control over the sterling which is important but then again, how many settings are you really going to be playing at. As far as sound, I actually thought the Sterling sounded better. More power and clearer than the 500. Both guitars seemed to be reviewed fairly well but keep in mind, you are paying $300 more for the Ibanez SR500 so the question really is, is it worth paying double for it???
As I said, I am not a bass player but I do know what sounds good but because I am not a bass player, maybe I am missing something and that is where your help can come in. Thank you.
First of the Sterling seems like it was double the weight as the 500 but it also did not feel like it was a toy guitar which the 500 can feel like because it is so light. The 500 had a smaller neck but not so much smaller that it is a deal breaker. The Sterling has a great finish on it and the 500 had that typical chipped stain that everyone complains about. Looking at just the finish, the idea of paying double the amount for a guitar that is known for a bad finish seems a little nuts. I understand it's just cosmetics but how the guitar is going to look in a year is also important especially if you are ever going to sell it. The 500 has more tone control over the sterling which is important but then again, how many settings are you really going to be playing at. As far as sound, I actually thought the Sterling sounded better. More power and clearer than the 500. Both guitars seemed to be reviewed fairly well but keep in mind, you are paying $300 more for the Ibanez SR500 so the question really is, is it worth paying double for it???
As I said, I am not a bass player but I do know what sounds good but because I am not a bass player, maybe I am missing something and that is where your help can come in. Thank you.