Even more so is her “from home” video series where she displays all her toys and discusses theories and applications of dealing with sound, without sound.I saw her TED-Talk, highly inspiring!
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
Even more so is her “from home” video series where she displays all her toys and discusses theories and applications of dealing with sound, without sound.I saw her TED-Talk, highly inspiring!
"Powerhouse!"
That's what I was thinking, too. We're talking somebody who's never heard music at all. I think I would start them out on something like Twinkle Twinkle Little Star, because it's a simple piece to start them out on as far as interpreting the way notes function together to make a melody. Something like that would be my absolute first choice, followed by the first movement of Beethoven's Moonlight Sonata. After that I would work into blues, rock, jazz and so forth. But my first choice would be the examples which are open enough to be able to examine the functions of music.I don't know if I can answer this. I'm thinking of how strange music would be to someone who has never heard it. Do you want them to like it? What's the first step there? Hard to say but I think it would have to be something simple and melodic. A quiet song. What are the first songs our mothers sing to us? The first songs we ever hear are usually lullabyes.
People seem to have thought it would be wise to go back to early music, but there really is no real reason why. I was thinking it would be cool to show the history and evolution of music, but I started around Bach. As you say, why not go right back?
That video is very cool btw!
Atari Teenage Riot would be an amusing one.If someone had never heard music before, what's the first thing you would get them to listen to?
Seems it would be too overwhelming to hear a multi-instrumental song regardless of genre. The ingredients need to be introduced individually first: strings, drums, vocals, keys, wind instruments, etc.
Then, let them hear a song that turns the ingredients into a meal.
That's what I was thinking, too. We're talking somebody who's never heard music at all. I think I would start them out on something like Twinkle Twinkle Little Star, because it's a simple piece to start them out on as far as interpreting the way notes function together to make a melody. Something like that would be my absolute first choice, followed by the first movement of Beethoven's Moonlight Sonata. After that I would work into blues, rock, jazz and so forth. But my first choice would be the examples which are open enough to be able to examine the functions of music.
I agree.That’s kinda why I went with Mahler. From the statement of those first simple intervals, to the first trill, to the full North Atlantic shipwreck crescendo, you achieve all of that in the first three minutes. And then some.
Never heard music is not the same as never been aware of music, many deaf people feel rhythm and beat, I've heard of deaf dancers and I will not be surprised when I see a deaf drummer or bass player. If the person is a standing next to the sub woofer feeling the beat of the latest Trance-dance-drum-and-bass-terror-band kind of guy... I'm not going for twinkle little star... they are just deaf, all the other brain and body functions still work.We're talking somebody who's never heard music at all.
I had an uncle who lost the majority of his hearing to scarlet fever as a young child. 100% in one ear, 75% in the other. He could play sax, keys, guitar and bass, and do it with other musicians. All by touch.