A M N said:
For you, but you can not wrap everyone in a nice neat little package.
I agree. I am very glad that I didn't do that.
I agree that getting a good framework is important, but no amount of learnin' can make you write or create music. All it can do is allow you to get it out of your head and into your hands, that's it.
"No amount of learnin' can make you write or create music." I'm sorry, I just don't understand that. Could you clarify, please, how you mean that?
I think it is very irresponsible to say that there is only one way to learn anything.
Me too, and I would never say that. The fact that you believe I said that is quite surprising, and I believe that you have misinterpreted my posts, which were very clear.
A teacher can help you learn the basics but he can not make you any more or any less creative then you are your self.
A teacher can help one learn a lot more than just basics. Perhaps the teachers you've encountered in the past were inadequate.
I think that saying all you need is a teacher is a copout when dealing with the subject of making up stuff.
I just don't understand. Honestly. I never, ever, ever, in this post, or any post, of my over 6,500 posts, have ever, ever, insinuated, implied, stated directly or indirectly that "all you need is a teacher." Wow. You truly have misread my posts.
Here's my first statement: "Have you considered a teacher?"
Here was the next statement, followed up by facts to support it: "I definitely disagree that a teacher cannot be of direct help."
I'm afraid that you may have interpreted my posts as one of the type of people who just says, "you can't learn on your own, get formal schooling." And further, I fear, and this is only an assumption, that you might be inclined to believe that theory and that sort of thing stifles creativity, and that either you have talent and musical ability or you don't. Hell, I don't know what you think. Maybe not.
Here's what I know, in no uncertain terms, the ways in which you've misinterpreted what I've said are astounding to me. Here's where I was coming from: FourString felt that he didn't really know how to improvise well, and was having trouble. Trust me, not only have I been there, I'm still there, struggling to find the voice, etc. etc. Lots of people offered lots of advice, and sure, I could've typed a 600 word statement on different techniques, theory, learning, etc etc.. In fact, I'm quite known for that, and have contributed quite a bit of significant and extremely helpful information to this forum, (I can provide links if you want). But, it just seemed to me, that as he looks for his goal, and other people give advice, the idea of him sitting down one on one with an instructor, might really open up new ideas and concepts to him, stuff that he hadn't developed yet. Now, I'm not sure where this all got all convuluted or what, but I dont' know about those the-talent-is-within-you vs. the-talent-can-be-developed vs. anything else arguments. I just don't know.
Here's what I know, and truly believe: A good teacher can be beneficial to most students.
That's it. That's where I'm coming from. If you disagree with above statement, fine. No problem. You may be right, as truth be told, I'm often quite wrong about this. But, man, oh man, I just don't understand where some of the stuff in your post came from. Seriously.