Well I'm glad I wasn't the only one who felt Dondi may have underestimated the level of dedication many of us amateur players have.
Although, Dondi, apologies for going right off on one there
Walk into a pit audition and sightread from the book @tempo, no mistakes,with only conducting for time, that's a pro... whether he gets paid or not.
That IS indeed professionalism, at a VERY high level.
Scenario: I work with a woman who plays violin. She, used to perform regularly in a quartet or whatever, playing from sheets in front of an audience. Yet she confesses she couldnt improvise a note, on the spot. So she's been a professional as per this example, but would be useless in a gigging band.
I think professionals are people that the general public would pay to have any given job done in what they believe is an expert manner.
Yes! This definition works absolutley for me.
Re: weddings and functions. I know some guys who play in a 60/70's pop/rock function band (they are over in Czechslovakia (sp.?!!) in a few weeks to play at a corporate function, all expenses plus a grand in hand (not bad huh!)
I've seen them play twice and to be blunt they aint all that great. They pull it off, but if it were me I'd want to give a better band performance. They're not as 'like the record' as I'd want a band to be for the money they get.
My point is that there's many levels of professional and you dont have to be a sight reading, jazz improvising, slap, pop, tap, finger, pick wielding genius to qualify!
