• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Is a bass player really necessary?

Status
Not open for further replies.
No jazz players here?
Is there no concept of an independent voice in that register?
Organ trios are fun to listen to but the bass part is just enough to support the harmony. But a bass player adds melodic counterpoint because he's not over-multitasking. I really don't care for groups with keyboard bass because the keys players don't think like a bass player. I'm a jazz bassist. People come to see me because I give them the experience of seeing a JAZZ bassist. No bass, no jazz.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dave Neal
Bass is awesome, but no you don't NEED to use any instrument you don't want to.

I have a game that I created for composition and songwriting. I call it a master builder. It's like rolling up a Dungeons and Dragons character but in song form. You do one roll to see how many instruments you can roll up on the instrument table, you roll to see what the first chord or note that will be played is and you roll on another table to see what time signature the song starts in.

I rolled up one song that all I can use is drums and percussion, vocals and cello.

You can add tables that tell you how many parts there should be in a song, what each part should sound like or the feel of sections, or time signatures for each part. I've narrowed it down to 3 maybe there's four I might be missing one. And the instrument table consists of whatever you have that you can play.
 
I feel like you don't really need one. A guitar is only an octave higher and it can still cover a lot of the notes that a bass guitar does. Also, you could just use an eight-string guitar and tune the lowest string down to a low E. I know that some bands have eight string guitarists as well as bassists and the bassists play the same notes as the the eight string guitar players, but the bass will make the low end sound "fuller" because of how thick the strings are. But I don't think that really makes any much of a difference. I know this question might make me appear ignorant, but this is my own judgement.

A guitarist could cover the higher notes, but generally not at the same time as playing the guitar parts. And yes strings do make a difference. The tone would not be the same at all - try it, all loose and floppy.

Nobody 'needs' a bass, but equally nobody needs a guitar.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dave Neal
I feel like you don't really need one.

I notice that genre is not specified in this thread...

Having watched Animals as Leaders live, I conclude that bass is not really necessary.

Having watched SMV live, I conclude that guitar is not really necessary.

Having watched any number of rappers perform on Saturday Night Live without a backing band, I conclude that instruments are not really necessary.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MikeOnBass73
No jazz players here?
Is there no concept of an independent voice in that register?
Organ trios are fun to listen to but the bass part is just enough to support the harmony. But a bass player adds melodic counterpoint because he's not over-multitasking. I really don't care for groups with keyboard bass because the keys players don't think like a bass player. I'm a jazz bassist. People come to see me because I give them the experience of seeing a JAZZ bassist. No bass, no jazz.

FYI, I play keys as well as bass. But when I play keys it's harder to get my left hand to 'think' and groove like a bassist. I actually find it easier to multitask:

 
  • Like
Reactions: Dave Neal
I feel like you don't really need one. A guitar is only an octave higher and it can still cover a lot of the notes that a bass guitar does. Also, you could just use an eight-string guitar and tune the lowest string down to a low E. I know that some bands have eight string guitarists as well as bassists and the bassists play the same notes as the the eight string guitar players, but the bass will make the low end sound "fuller" because of how thick the strings are. But I don't think that really makes any much of a difference. I know this question might make me appear ignorant, but this is my own judgement.[/QUO
I feel like you don't really need one. A guitar is only an octave higher and it can still cover a lot of the notes that a bass guitar does. Also, you could just use an eight-string guitar and tune the lowest string down to a low E. I know that some bands have eight string guitarists as well as bassists and the bassists play the same notes as the the eight string guitar players, but the bass will make the low end sound "fuller" because of how thick the strings are. But I don't think that really makes any much of a difference. I know this question might make me appear ignorant, but this is my own judgement.
Punched a guitar player in the face once... it felt great.... no bass no band.
 
I feel like you don't really need one. A guitar is only an octave higher and it can still cover a lot of the notes that a bass guitar does. Also, you could just use an eight-string guitar and tune the lowest string down to a low E. I know that some bands have eight string guitarists as well as bassists and the bassists play the same notes as the the eight string guitar players, but the bass will make the low end sound "fuller" because of how thick the strings are. But I don't think that really makes any much of a difference. I know this question might make me appear ignorant, but this is my own judgement.
Listen to a polka band with a tuba, then listen to a polka band with a bass guitar and then tell us what you like better.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts