TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
They certainly are no longer for the budget minded! Basses are over $1000 without anything special. That puts them in the MIA Fender range and I just can't see that. I know they had always been pretty good quality, but a fair to midland price.
I hear ya im not impressed with what the dollar gets you anymore with Carvin. Too much $$ for a lifeless sound IMO
The only Carvin I ever played was a Bunny Brunel signature. It sounded great and played well but the neck pocket had a HUGE gap around the neck, I could fit two quarters side by side in there. I hadn't seen such bad construction from 80$ ibanez starter pack basses, much less something they were asking 500$ (used) for. This was in 03' and I have never seen anything new from them, fwiw.

I hear ya im not impressed with what the dollar gets you anymore with Carvin. Too much $$ for a lifeless sound IMO
tobiasaurusrex said:There's a lot here quickly. Some of it seems to call for some credentials of some sort. "Did I hear discontent? Your papers, please? Everything is fine, go home citizen." Don't forget, "Oh, the OP isn't OCD about the TB /b/. It's a hoax."
I have had excellent experience with the earlier, carbon rod buttressed Carvin necks, and expected another veritable tank of a neck, however the thin, six-string neck with single truss rod, and set up with an action granting clean, buzzless fretting... cannot but flex and flop, and makes true intonation impossible. If you've played bass long enough, you know the phenomena (whether or not you admit that Carvin could let someone down ever).
So it took a couple of months from new for the neck to bow towards the bridge, and I can't send it back now. The finish and computer controlled wood machining are clean, and it's a beautiful object. I have what I have from Carvin now, I spent $1,700 on it, I'm stuck with it at this point, and it's going to work the way I freaking want it too. The way my other Carvin necks are.
I've worked in wood for years, I've worked with glassing for surfboards, glass and wood for kayaks, and I make my own basses. A laminate can be sanded off, and if it makes the bass work right, is it so wrong?

So it took a couple of months from new for the neck to bow towards the bridge, and I can't send it back now.
I have had excellent experience with the earlier, carbon rod buttressed Carvin necks, and expected another veritable tank of a neck, however the thin, six-string neck with single truss rod, and set up with an action granting clean, buzzless fretting... cannot but flex and flop, and makes true intonation impossible. If you've played bass long enough, you know the phenomena (whether or not you admit that Carvin could let someone down ever).
... but I think posting pictures of the bass would add some credibility to your argument.
I hear ya im not impressed with what the dollar gets you anymore with Carvin. Too much $$ for a lifeless sound IMO
Interesting that it took 4 months to figure out the neck was flopping around. That would have been the first thing I noticed. If it was impossible to intonate, you shoud have sent it back. However, I refuse to believe that Carvin shipped you a bass that they could not tune or intonate. "Maybe he won't notice...ship it out!" Didn't happen.
So what did they say when you called them and reported the problem?
The only Carvin I ever played was a Bunny Brunel signature. It sounded great and played well but the neck pocket had a HUGE gap around the neck, I could fit two quarters side by side in there. I hadn't seen such bad construction from 80$ ibanez starter pack basses, much less something they were asking 500$ (used) for. This was in 03' and I have never seen anything new from them, fwiw.
Looks like a back-of-neck lamination it is.
Sucks to get the bad apple.