• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Is Deep Purple in the same league with Led Zeppelin?

Is Deep Purple in the same league with Led Zeppelin?


  • Total voters
    706
Usually, i agree. It's not a competitive sport. But these two units are so different, it's like asking if Bach and Elvis are equals in music. No, no they're not.
Bach and Elvis? ROFL!!! Zep certainly ain’t Bach…. If anything, Purple ‘borrowed’ far more from Bach while Zep ‘borrowed’ far more from the blues.

As for the ‘various reasons’ Purple never really maintained momentum, well… again, in Europe and Asia that scenario played out differently in the early 70s. Despite the “various reason” named Ritchie Blackmore, who has succeeded multiple times in spite of himself. Purple of course…. But then there’s Rainbow, which with Rising launched what we now know as prog-metal. And on the next record, the stunning solo on Gates of Babylon foretold the coming of Yngwie and all the rest of those shredders. Speaking of which, there’s no question that Ritchie was far and away the biggest influence on Eddie VanHalen. Ed said otherwise in later interviews after Blackmore had publicly been an ass to him (a trait Ed, Yngwie, and others also carried forth! lol), but VH regularly performed DP and Rainbow material prior to their ascent to the top of the world.

Back to Ritchie. After Rainbow’s prog-metal, they had a string of pop hits. Then there was the DP reunion, where the band finally got a great production on the recording and produced some great stuff (check out Gypsy’s Kiss). And then he went off into renaissance-style music, and Blackmore’s Night finds him still managing to get a few minor hits while continuing to produce new music.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Artman
I'm not sure Zeppelin is popular with new audiences. Immigrant Song was in Thor sure, but I can't say I've ever heard any 20 somethings talking about any of these 70s bands.

I take that back, kids today do know Rush.

That’s only due to, “slappa da bass, mon.”

I will say this, LZ does have a lot more merchandise on the streets for kids to find and buy than DP does. I think Target even sells LZ shirts. Can’t say the same for DP.
 
It would be awesome if Deep Purple had Zep’s production.

Zep always just sounds better as the overall recording quality of DPs stuff just isn’t as high. Even their most polished pre-1980s albums have somewhat ratty production.
Martin Birch is pretty much considered the master of hard rock/early metal/Brit metal production. You may prefer Zep’s production but Birch wrote the book.
 
That’s only due to, “slappa da bass, mon.”

I will say this, LZ does have a lot more merchandise on the streets for kids to find and buy than DP does. I think Target even sells LZ shirts. Can’t say the same for DP.

From what I've gleaned in this thread so far, that might only hold true in America. Expand to Europe and Japan and it might be a different story.

Or I could be wrong. I know nothing of merchandising.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jmattbassplaya
John Paul Jones is a wizard on keys, but Jon Lord was truly a God of the Hammond B3.

Just an observation. :)
Your thoughts? Are these two bands in the same league? If not, why?

I think the European and American perspective on DP vs. LZ are quite different.
In America Deep Purple are generally not considered to be the same tier as Zep, while in Europe Zep and Purple are considered the same tier, because in Europe Deep Purple generally have a much higher status than in the USA. In America Zep could have a status "the ultimate rock gods". That was always my impression. Maybe I'm wrong.

Let's discuss.
I like DP but they are not in the same league as Zep.
 
  • Like
Reactions: FRoss6788
What is the definition of "to be in the same league"?
- Fame?
- Number of unforgettable songs?
- In 100 years, will we still listen to them? (in case humanity stil exist in 100 years)
- Creativity, abbility to explore various new musical genres?
- Influence on musicians of the next couple of decades?

Whatever definition you pick in this list, they're not in the same league, IMHO