Excuses versus explanations. Does it depend upon the person? Or just a fine line between the two....If so, what do you use to gauge the difference between the two.
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
Excuse -
Attempt to lessen the blame attaching to (a fault or offense); seek to defend or justify.
Explanation -
A reason or justification given for an action or belief.
Excuse: Knowing you have done something, but are trying not to accept responsability.
Explanation: Doing something, accepting responsability and then talking about it.
No, there is no difference when examining that subject in a human relationship perspective. The reason there is no difference is that the observation of the dialog is subjective to such an extent that pre-existing notions of what is being expressed can color any interaction. This pre-judgment can be due to a variety of external (or internal) factors.
It would take a uninvolved third party to even start to untie that knot. If one individual BELIEVES that they are producing an explanation, not an excuse, and another individual (in a discourse between two people) simply doesn't believe that dialog is an explanation, there is no chance for common ground. This is why an UN-emmeshed outside third party is utilized to broker decisions from two opposing viewpoints.

However many times, what is an explanation to the person explaining is an excuse to the person listening.