Was for me, anyway, in so far an actual "concerto" in the classical sense..
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
Was for me, anyway, in so far an actual "concerto" in the classical sense..
Well, it you want to consider Deep Purple, how about this oddity from 1972
Was for me, anyway, in so far an actual "concerto" in the classical sense..
Was for me, anyway, in so far an actual "concerto" in the classical sense..
It’s orchestral, and there’s the precedent of Gershwin’s works that were considered classical, but drew heavily from the jazz idiom of his times(not to mention so many of his individual songs have become jazz standards). Then there are the Ellington Suites. It also reminds me of soundtrack work, so I’d say it sits on the fine line between.What exactly puts it in the "classical sense"? Sounds more like jazz to me.
It’s orchestral, and there’s the precedent of Gershwin’s works that were considered classical, but drew heavily from the jazz idiom of his times(not to mention so many of his individual songs have become jazz standards). Then there are the Ellington Suites. It also reminds me of soundtrack work, so I’d say it sits on the fine line between.
This is factually true. 'Classical' is a period in music, and most people mistakenly call all symphonic music 'classical'. Gershwin is considered a 20th Century composer.Cant agree. adding an orchestra does not make it classical.