This is some funny stuff. The true history of Black Sabbath's malfeasance in stealing the spotlight from pre-eminent jazz trio, Jazz Sabbath. Not too far off Spinal Tap.
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
Good stuff.![]()
(124) No More Mr. Nice Guy - YouTubeI've listened to some of the Sabbath cover tunes and thought that they were pretty good. The bass lines in some could have been morphed into better walking lines here and there rather than repetitive cycles, but overall, pretty cool. I've experimented with a jazzy version of War Pigs a few years ago, but never really got anywhere on my own (the band was not really into the idea). I might re-approach the notion, now that I've got enough instruments at the house to put together everything in the absence of a collaborative effort. I can think of more than a few tunes by other bands that would sound sweet with a similar treatment as an alternative to the "funk version" of classic rock standards.

I've been really digging what Brown Sabbath has been doing with that catalog.
A typical case of "the apple doesn't fall far from the tree". Adam Wakeman inherited not only his dad's musical talents, but also his wicked sense of humour!

Can you bet on a fact?Thats funny! I wonder if Adam Wakeman is Rick Wakemans son?
My bet is yes.
See now, I played in a jazz quartet for a few years and kept trying to get them to do odd covers, like Sabbath, Soundgarden, RATM, White Stripes, but they were all too traditional and were having none of it. We could have been youtube stars I tells ya.
That was my argument too, but a lot of people get very rigid about what's 'allowed' -- I imagine Charlie Parker ran into that a lot too but he just kept on doing it anywayAs far as I'm concerned, classic rock is old enough to have standards and what is jazz if not making use of well known standards in inventive contexts. The only real difference I see is that the standards used by the earlier jazz guys had already exited their copyrights, whereas the classic rock sorts are holding onto whatever they can for as long as they can and then selling to to holding companies in the end.