TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
Shorted, and with the limited power handling you will probably be ok as is. It won't hurt for the tuning to be a little bit higher either.I just used an online calculator and it's coming up with 3.9 cf.
But my ports are 3" dia x 5"
Would you go shorter or longer to make the speaker feel like a 4" port? Or cut the 4 " hole?
With such a big volume like 4.0 cu.ft. the (HPF alignment) may become quite narrow to a Tschebycheff alignment.You'll get premium tone with the 4.0 cu.ft. box mentioned above,
I'm currently experimenting with a K140 into a 3.2 cu.ft. box tuned to 40Hz.
I just used an online calculator and it's coming up with 3.9 cf.
But my ports are 3" dia x 5"
Would you go shorter or longer to make the speaker feel like a 4" port? Or cut the 4 " hole?
To my taste 40Hz of tuning was way to low and, I woudn't suggest it for 3.2 cu.ft. of net volume.
Before you cut 4" holes (ideal), try shortening your 3" diameter vents to 2 3/4", which should give about 40 Hz tuning. (The minimum recommended diameter is 3.172" according to BASSBOX). Chuffing is the term used to describe unwanted sounds coming from ports that are too small, especially evident at high volume levels.
Now you say 3.4 cu ft, so two 3" ports, 3 3/4" long.
That's based on one set of parameters, every solution is a compromise and I agree with ThisBass that a higher tuning might be an improvement.
What is in there now are 2- 3" x 5" ports
The original port , i think is, 2 1/2" long and I still have them. I could re-glue them in.