• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Kubicki X Factor on SBL

I more meant that giving up the extender, to get a 34" scale length was a strange choice. Why get a rare custom bass with a unique feature ( the extender) and then ask them to take it off so that your new bass is more like a regular bass!
My guess is that if you've got a low B, you don't need to get lower :smug:

But more seriously, the Factor series has a lot more going on than that extender on the headstock. The neck construction is kind of amazing, and the body shape is eye-catching but surprisingly comfortable. It was a package full of great ideas, the lack of one of them didn't diminish the others.
 
Just to add here, you now have the option to order it with either the 9v pre-amp, same one that is in my Jazz Plus, or the original 18v pre-amp. Some people prefer the sound of the 9v. Plus, think of all the money you will save on batteries!
 
The only innovation of the Kubicki headstock was adapting the string extensions used on double basses since 1880. You seldom see orchestra basses without them nowadays. I didn't bother watching the video, does he mention this?
Not the only innovation around the headstock...

The laminate neck.
running the strings backwards
the "mini" headstock shape to anchor the strings
the truss rod runs straight through the headstock so is the most accessible possible.
 
Not the only innovation around the headstock...

The laminate neck.

Hardly the first laminate guitar neck. How about Alembic and Pedulla, they both predate Kubicki.

Is the skunk stripe on a Ric just for truss rod access or is it a laminate neck?
I remember some el cheapo Japanese instruments in the 1960s had lamintaed necks, but more like plywood laminations.
 
  • Like
Reactions: tindrum
I don’t know much of the history, and am going on the description for THIS red one on Reverb, but apparently they considered moving manufacturing to Japan and changed the model name to Blaster. Again, no idea if this is true, or whether there were any manufacturing changes that would significantly impact quality, but the price is a lot more palatable and my experiences with Japanese bases has nearly always been positive. @Dr. Cheese GAS circuits activated. …strangely I don’t mind Scott’s pink one.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dr. Cheese
Not the only innovation around the headstock...

The laminate neck.
running the strings backwards
the "mini" headstock shape to anchor the strings
the truss rod runs straight through the headstock so is the most accessible possible.
The side position markers were much easier to see ovals rather than dots.
Pickups were contoured to make them less in the way
Zero neck dive. Zero neck heaviness.

Mine was heavy though.
 
The Ex Factor was another victim (along with Steinberger) of the general Bass Snobbery that couldn't wrap it's mind around a headless bass "It's just too 80's". Glad to see it's been resurrected after Phil's passing. When I bought my Steinberger XP-2 ( CF bolt-on neck and maple body) in 1986, I compared it with the L2 (which I couldn't afford) and the Kubicki, which in retrospect I wish I'd bought. At the time I think it was something like $300 more than the Steinberger, and I simply didn't have it. Shoulda bit the bullet and charged it or put it on layaway. No complaints about the Steinberger, I still have it, and it NEVER goes out of tune, but the laminated wood neck construction on the Kubicki, and the brilliant D-tuner system, along with accepting standard bass strings, made it a superior bass in many respects. There's a TB builder named @MPU who recently built his own copy, including the D-Tuner, but used a different bridge tuner system, worth checking out his build on Luthier's Corner, impeccable workmanship. Alas, $4500 on a bass (when I already own 6 basses) would be tough to explain to my wife. :)

 
I don’t know much of the history, and am going on the description for THIS red one on Reverb, but apparently they considered moving manufacturing to Japan and changed the model name to Blaster. Again, no idea if this is true, or whether there were any manufacturing changes that would significantly impact quality, but the price is a lot more palatable and my experiences with Japanese bases has nearly always been positive. @Dr. Cheese GAS circuits activated. …strangely I don’t mind Scott’s pink one.
Blasters were made by a Japanese company that really, really wanted to be endorsed by Phil, but weren't.
The only licensed non-Kubicki made versions were made by Fender, and were 9V.
Blasters are not Kubicki.