• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Lakland Owners Group #69

Don't overlook a DJ5. Having owned more than a couple 55-02 and DJ5 I never found a connection with the 55-02. I know they're beloved for their versatility but not for me. Perhaps it's the pickups or electronics package but I never found the sound as articulate or pleasing to my taste as the DJ5. Fine absoutely stock, but add an East or Audere pre and it'll take you anywhere you need to go.
Then I must have a bad DJ5 mines needs shimming, fret spout galore, this thing needs a better neck, which is disappointing because my log p5 and 5501 are great. I think that's the biggest difference between Skylines and USA among other things, the stability of the neck...
 
Then I must have a bad DJ5 mines needs shimming, fret spout galore, this thing needs a better neck, which is disappointing because my log p5 and 5501 are great. I think that's the biggest difference between Skylines and USA among other things, the stability of the neck...
Interesting, and I agree, that is rare. I recently had a Skyline J-sonic model with a badly warped neck. First and only guitar or bass I ever had with that condition so I accept things happen. I have probably owned 7-8 DJ5 and never experienced your issues. Every Skyline DJ and others, J-Sonic excepted, have not been an issue. All have been preference keep or sell.
 
  • Like
Reactions: odarellmc
I’m back to loving my 44-02. Especially for recording. The DJ-4 had a brief comeback as my #1 but now it’s back to #2 View attachment 5141164

Similarly - I use my 55-94 for recording whereas the my 55-60 has been my live bass for 5 years now. I prefer the way that Jazz body hangs off the strap when playing live compared to the 55-94/14/02.

Our most recent single recorded with my LH3 55-94.



Plus the neck of my 55-60 is getting that really nice and worn feel to it.

IMG_8274.jpeg
 
Similarly - I use my 55-94 for recording whereas the my 55-60 has been my live bass for 5 years now. I prefer the way that Jazz body hangs off the strap when playing live compared to the 55-94/14/02.

Our most recent single recorded with my LH3 55-94.



Plus the neck of my 55-60 is getting that really nice and worn feel to it.

View attachment 5141782

Exactly the same here. 44-02 for recording and home play and DJ-4 for band play.
 
Oh man, every time I see these Hollowbody basses I want one. These are really beautiful instruments and I love the idea that they are 34" scale. And everyone seems to string these with flats.

Two questions.
1. Looks like you have an active preamp in there. What did you add?

2. Also, how comfortable are they to play. I tried a Gibson Hollowbody years ago and the sharp edge cut into my plucking arm. These look somewhat contoured.

I have the same bass, get a bit frustrated with the single coil hum and not a fan of two volumes. Notice the extra knob and the battery at the back, I presume you have gone active passive? What system are you running with?
Cheers
Wayne

1, previous owner updated it to John East preamp. Vol, Bal, Tone (pull to passive, works in both modes), bass, treble.
Extremely musical preamp, I like it very much. I run it set flat in active mode most of the time, using tone pot only. Both pickups have very different voicings, so it's actually really universal bass.

I had more Lakland HBs in past, but always preferred sound of Chi sonics over sometimes too dark Barts.

2, ergonomy is top notch here, even balance on strap is great (4,2kg). No sharp edges at all.
 
1, previous owner updated it to John East preamp. Vol, Bal, Tone (pull to passive, works in both modes), bass, treble.
Extremely musical preamp, I like it very much. I run it set flat in active mode most of the time, using tone pot only. Both pickups have very different voicings, so it's actually really universal bass.

I had more Lakland HBs in past, but always preferred sound of Chi sonics over sometimes too dark Barts.

2, ergonomy is top notch here, even balance on strap is great (4,2kg). No sharp edges at all.
Hi Davidak
Thanks for that, will definitely look into it.
 
Question:
When I tried this out at the store, I did not realize that the volume was push/pull for active bypass. I get no output (zero) in passive. This is either a wiring issue or bad pot. Am I missing out on anything in passive? Opinions on leaving it as is or shall I contact lakland? View attachment 5144274

You won’t get anything at zero in the passive mode. Above that, you’ll begin to get a little trickle of volume. It comes up very gradually and is nothing like the volume you get with the
preamp engaged.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: GregC
Volume is full on with zero sound when bypassed. Is it a big deal or am I not missing much? I know these aren’t exactly known for their passive sound.

You should be able to run the bass in passive mode, the output is kind of weak and the tone controls don't work, but the volume, pickup pan and coil tap for the back humbucker should work. Maybe the push/pull volume control is bad, or something else is loose inside. I'd get it fixed, as it's a nice feature in case the battery dies you can just pull the knob and finish a set or gig until you can replace the battery.
Not a big deal, good luck !!