Enjoy the benefits of a premium membership!
Upgrade Account
-
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
Two great choices, no disappointments either way. I went Lākland because I like the 4-94 features and design. I couldn't be happier with my choice. The neck is simply wonderful and seems to make the notes bloom unlike any other bass I've played.
A US 55-64 will certainly have a quartersawn neck and the Lull may or may not. Both will have a premium, well oriented and seasoned piece of neck wood, so either should be awesome. Other than that, electronics and ergonomics will be the tippers. Have fun deciding and stand by your choice!
A US 55-64 will certainly have a quartersawn neck and the Lull may or may not. Both will have a premium, well oriented and seasoned piece of neck wood, so either should be awesome. Other than that, electronics and ergonomics will be the tippers. Have fun deciding and stand by your choice!
I have a Mike Lull P-5, 35" scale, with a maple neck, and it is an awesome instrument. Mike and Paul at ML Guitars are fantastic to work with and the fit and finish is perfect (my experience) they offer options for the bass and make the experience first class. My bass moves allot of air!!! Big sound, even across the strings and easy to play and set up.
Lakland - another great instrument, great fit and finish, great folks to work with, another great experience and John is a great guy.
You really couldn't go wrong with either bass.
If I had to pick one it would be the Lull. Good luck.
Lakland - another great instrument, great fit and finish, great folks to work with, another great experience and John is a great guy.
You really couldn't go wrong with either bass.
If I had to pick one it would be the Lull. Good luck.
What is it about the Fender that you don't like, or needs to be upgraded?
You can't go wrong with either one. My Lakland JO4 is the best 4 string J I've ever played, and my Lull M5V's are the best 5 string J's I've ever played.
Another difference would be string spacing and scale length.
The Lull is 18mm at the bridge while the Lakland is 19mm.
The Lull is available in both 34" and 35" scale and I'm pretty sure the Lakland is only available in 35".
The Lull has a straight 12" radius vs. the 10-13" compound on the Lakland.
Another difference would be string spacing and scale length.
The Lull is 18mm at the bridge while the Lakland is 19mm.
The Lull is available in both 34" and 35" scale and I'm pretty sure the Lakland is only available in 35".
The Lull has a straight 12" radius vs. the 10-13" compound on the Lakland.
If the OP would prefer 35" scale or 19mm spacing, I can see it. If not, he is just spending for the same thing.
Lakland or Lull...
That's like flipping a two-headed coin (assuming you choose "Heads")
You'll always win!
That's like flipping a two-headed coin (assuming you choose "Heads")
You'll always win!
A USA Lakland will have more attention to detail than a Fender, as would a Lull P5. My question is why the change because both Lull and Lakland are 35" scale, and Lakland also has 19mm spacing at the bridge. Both of the "upgrades" will feel and play differently than a Fender P5. If the OP simply wants a better made Fender style P5, he might want to look into ordering a Moollon. I don't know if they are 18 or 19mm at the bridge.
Lakland by far. Lulls are nice. Lakland are amazing. I literally only have Laklands and a fodera. That is how good Lakland is
The neck profiles are different. You might like the feel of one over the other.
I love my Lull P4. I considered Laklands too, but couldn't find one that met all my criteria. My Lull comes in under 8 pounds and everything about it is great. I think Lulls are amazing, and Laklands are nice...seriously though, you can't go wrong with either one. I'd say it will come down to features and details, e.g. string spacing, neck profile and finish, etc. As others have mentioned...
CrashClint
I Play Bass therefore I Am
Both basses are very nice but let's throw in a new Roscoe Classic Custom, mine plays really sweet 19mm spacing 34" scale! Also available in PJ configuration. 5 string will be 19mm spacing with 35" scale.
View attachment 1138296 View attachment 1138298 View attachment 1138299
View attachment 1138296 View attachment 1138298 View attachment 1138299
There are more Laklands out in the world, but everyone who has played them raves about Mike Lull.
That's what I'd go with.
DISCLAIMER: Although I have a G & L, I don't play or lust after Fender-type basses. If I was going to get one, it would probably be a Sadowsky or a Dingwall.
That's what I'd go with.
DISCLAIMER: Although I have a G & L, I don't play or lust after Fender-type basses. If I was going to get one, it would probably be a Sadowsky or a Dingwall.
I would disagree- there are very few US Lakland P5's (BG5/55-64) out there... there's definitely more basses out there with a Lakland sticker on the headstock though...
For the OP, I own a Lakland BG5, it's great and I love it. But you'll probably have to custom order one as they are not currently in production. Lakland uses the same neck shape for all their US 5 strings though, so you can get an idea of the neck and if you like it. If you're in the Chicago area, you're welcome to check mine out. It was just set up by Carl Pedigo, so it's like butter.
I have never played a Lull, but they have an excellent reputation. As others have said, I doubt you'll go wrong either way.
