TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
Dingwall’s earlier basses used threaded inserts, but their newer basses that I’ve seen have 1/4”-20 threads tapped into the maple — and tapping threads into the wood is a REALLY reliable way to attach them.I think Dingwall uses the metal inserts. I had them installed in a couple of my Warmoth necks so I can swap them to my heart's content!
I'm surprised that he wasn't concerned about the neck stretching under the weight of the bass, thus causing intonation issues. Equally possible.There was a topic similar to this one awhile back concerning wall hooks. The poster was concerned that hanging a bass on a wall hook could loosen up the wood screws that hold the neck to the body.
Why not just use threaded metal inserts, and then get smaller screws? Imo, the "problem" is now solved.
This is how I build all of my bolt-on necks. It works really well.
Looking around on Reverb and other (local) used stuff sites, i see a lot of basses with the necks removed to show whats underneath.
I'm a technician and also a pretty curious guy... but this always rustles my jimmies. A lot of basses have what is called a "bolt-on" construction. In fact no bolt ever comes near it (wish they did). It is "screwed on" and everyone who ever used screws knows that it's in some way a destructive process. As a screw is turned in, the "thread" is being cut. This is not neat and nice thread like when a bolt is used, but crude and actually different for each screw. It's a very secure connection and solid and ridgid etc, but when you loosen the screws to remove the neck, you can, in some cases, see wood come out of the hole. meaning, the next time you reinstall it, the screws will have lost some power, tightening wise. worst thing that can happen is not the same screw in the same hole. No screw is exactly the same as an other one.
I know i'm a Nitpick right now, but i've been thinking about this for quite a while and find myself looking at awesome J-Basses that are and look great, but i hit the little cross as soon as i see a picture with the neck removed or a clearly damaged neck-joint.
Am i alone in this? am i going too far with it? Should i go to therapy?
This reminds me of the thing going around in the 80's about not getting back into your car when pumping gas because when you get back out your clothes could create static electricity which could cause a spark so when you touch the metal nozzle to remove it from your tank the spark could fly down the gas tank and cause an explosion. Yea![]()
"And my time is a piece of wax falling on a termite choking on a splinter"
Post of the month!!
Please tell us how to prevent pickguard mojo leaks!!
Also, seems like a good idea when reinstalling the screws: turn them counter-clockwise by hand for just a bit until you feel it "click" into the pre-cut threads in the wood. Then tighten. That way the screw won't be tempted to cut new threads in the wood.
Care to share the right and wrong ways to do it? Thanks.
I feel ya. I personally don’t touch basses that pictures show they clearly have been taken apart because I don’t know the competency of the seller. I get some people want to know for example if a vintage fender is legit. But I never felt the need to spend a fortune on super old gear.