• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Legit 1964 or Refinish

Looking at this 64. Worried that it might be refinished. Seller doesn't want to pop the neck so won't be able to see that way. Does the finish look right for u guys?
 

Attachments

  • download_20140527_134518.jpeg
    download_20140527_134518.jpeg
    37.4 KB · Views: 452
  • download_20140527_134513.jpeg
    download_20140527_134513.jpeg
    39.2 KB · Views: 443
  • download_20140527_134508.jpeg
    download_20140527_134508.jpeg
    37 KB · Views: 439
  • download_20140527_134504.jpeg
    download_20140527_134504.jpeg
    24 KB · Views: 418
  • download_20140527_134451.jpeg
    download_20140527_134451.jpeg
    21.2 KB · Views: 413
  • download_20140527_134446.jpeg
    download_20140527_134446.jpeg
    24.9 KB · Views: 434
Seller who doesn't want to take off the neck would be a red flag to me, then again I'm not very trusting.

If the guy is trying to sell a collectible piece, he has to provide some proof. Neck pocket, neck end, pots - the whole sheebang. Lacking that, I say *pass*.

And while that bass *appears* correct to me, it's too thrashed for my tastes.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SirMjac28
I would be concerned if buyer does not remove neck. If not some kind of certification from a credible vintage expert (Gruhn).
As for the looks, that thing looks legit to me. Incredible re-finish if that is the case. Very realistic. Pickguard looks right as does the fretboard. The bridge and pickup covers do look new but they may have sat in the case for its lifetime. A pricey item I am sure so If it were me, I would like to be sure it was original. Looks very convincing though.
 
If the seller is asking the going rate for a pre-CBS bass, then he HAS to remove the neck. That's too much money to risk.

Though the photos aren't very good, the bass seems ok. I question the wear pattern on the back of the neck, but then again, the photo is too dark to be conclusive.
 
I actually bought this exact bass and have it at home now. It checks out, it's 100% original.

For the record, he was ok with someone taking it apart after the sale & offered a full refund if it didn't check out. he just didn't want people taking his bass apart, as it hasn't been taken apart in a very, very long time.

By the way the bass is incredible, it's a gem.
 
.
I actually bought this exact bass and have it at home now. It checks out, it's 100% original.

For the record, he was ok with someone taking it apart after the sale & offered a full refund if it didn't check out. he just didn't want people taking his bass apart, as it hasn't been taken apart in a very, very long time.

By the way the bass is incredible, it's a gem.
....uhh...could we all see the neck date stamp now.....;)

IMO that bass has some of the best wear I have ever seen. Hopefully it plays as nice as it looks.
 
.

....uhh...could we all see the neck date stamp now.....;)

IMO that bass has some of the best wear I have ever seen. Hopefully it plays as nice as it looks.

Just posted pics. Yes, it's a really, really good playing bass. There's a reason it's so worn - it's an amazing bass that has been played & played & played. It is pretty close to needing a fretjob, though... which is why I'm keeping flats on it for now.
 
Jesus, God almighty. It should be mandatory that if someone tries a refin on that, they need to automatically be stoned with huge boulders, and then drug to the gallows. She is a beauty, for sure. Nice acquisition, sir.

Well thank you. And I agree.

I did have to sell my Pino Palladino bass and a Warwick Thumb to buy this though, so it wasn't a painless acquisition, that's for sure.
 

Latest posts