• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Let's talk about the Ashdown Little Bastard

I will soon aquire an Ashdown Little Bastard 30 tube amp, and have enjoyed reading all the related posts on this thread. I currently own a few amps including a '76 Ampeg B15 which is my only all tube amp. I also own an Ashdown 550 Spyder twin-tube pre which I use for shows coupled with the '76 Portaflex 15" cab loaded w/a late '60s JBL D-45R speaker. I have used the Portaflex head for live shows, but primnarily use it for recording these days.

I really like my 550 Spyder and am looking forward to hearing the Ashdown LB30. Once that happens will dertermine where it fits in to my needs - possibly as my rehearsal-space amp. My (2) bands don't play loud - both favor tone/dynamics over volume. I'm hoping the Ashdown will deliver what is required there. Will post more once it all plays out.
Congratulations and welcome to the fold! There's a lot of exploration to be had dialing in tones but once you figure out how it all adjusts it's as versatile as any amp out there. They each seem to be a bit different as well. I've had a China built and UK build and they were pretty different from each other.
 
@JIO This is a very relevant comment:
I've had a China built and UK build and they were pretty different from each other.
Ashdowns tend to be awesome, but they can be a bit quirky.

I have one of the original Sino LB30s and it sounds pretty similar to my 427, which has the old Dual Tube preamp used in your Spyder.

I also have UK Custom Shop Mk2. The sound is much more mid scooped and HiFi, with huge lows.

Near as I can tell, the tone stack in the Mk2 has different component values and one connection has been changed, so it functions more like a Hiwatt tone stack than a Fender tone stack. It does not sound like a Hiwatt though. The Mid control rotary does little to nothing, depending on the position of the switches and other rotary controls. The Low Freq switch also does not really produce much, if any audible change. As far as I can tell the Low Freq switch adjusts the cutoff for an HPF, and both options are so low that I can't hear a difference.

You can quickly tell the difference by looking at the front panel. The order of the tone control rotaries on the original amps is Mid, Bass, Treble. If the order is Bass, Mid, Treble, you have a Mk2. No idea if this is true for all Mk2s.

Both are great sounding amps, but they do sound considerably different.

If you are curious, the newer CTM 30 Little Stubby is voiced similar to the original LB30s. The LB30 sounds a bit more vintage and Little Stubby sounds a bit more modern IMHO.

Hope you enjoy your "new-to-me" amp.
 
Mine is a MkI then. The tone controls all work fine, although they interact in a way that I needed some some time getting used to.

It's a great sounding amp, and I love the tone I get when pushing it into the edge of breakup. It does have a rather "baked-in" tone that can't really be dialled out though. It's definitely on the dark/warm/fat side of the tonal spectrum, bordering on muddy with SOME cabs. I guess you could call it a "vintage" tone, although that would indicate that all vintage amps have a dark/warm tone, which really isn't the case at all.

I got mine on a sale for the equivalent of around $5-600 (if I remember correctly). The tube DI output was worth the price alone. It's a shame it can't be run in silent mode and that the tone controls affects both the signal going to the cab and DI output. It would have been so much more versatile for recording if the tone controls hadn't affected the DI output. But I guess that would have been impossible when the DI output is tapped off the output transformer, which is probably the reason why can sound so AMAZING for recording direct. Output tube saturation rather than fizzy preamp distortion? YES PLEASE!!!!
 
Congratulations and welcome to the fold! There's a lot of exploration to be had dialing in tones but once you figure out how it all adjusts it's as versatile as any amp out there. They each seem to be a bit different as well. I've had a China built and UK build and they were pretty different from each other.

@JIO This is a very relevant comment:

Ashdowns tend to be awesome, but they can be a bit quirky.

I have one of the original Sino LB30s and it sounds pretty similar to my 427, which has the old Dual Tube preamp used in your Spyder.

I also have UK Custom Shop Mk2. The sound is much more mid scooped and HiFi, with huge lows.

Near as I can tell, the tone stack in the Mk2 has different component values and one connection has been changed, so it functions more like a Hiwatt tone stack than a Fender tone stack. It does not sound like a Hiwatt though. The Mid control rotary does little to nothing, depending on the position of the switches and other rotary controls. The Low Freq switch also does not really produce much, if any audible change. As far as I can tell the Low Freq switch adjusts the cutoff for an HPF, and both options are so low that I can't hear a difference.

You can quickly tell the difference by looking at the front panel. The order of the tone control rotaries on the original amps is Mid, Bass, Treble. If the order is Bass, Mid, Treble, you have a Mk2. No idea if this is true for all Mk2s.

Both are great sounding amps, but they do sound considerably different.

If you are curious, the newer CTM 30 Little Stubby is voiced similar to the original LB30s. The LB30 sounds a bit more vintage and Little Stubby sounds a bit more modern IMHO.

Hope you enjoy your "new-to-me" amp.

Thanks so much guys :thumbsup: - this for me is what makes tb a great place to hang. I do favor a more vintage tone and it's why I like my Ampeg B15 & Ashdown 550 Spyder. Both bands I play with play many of what I consider '60s "classical pop" songs, of which I try to cop that specific bass sound/tone. (pick & palm muting included) I will know more about the order of the front panel control rotaries once I get it and will post pics. I think tubes have been upgraded but again, will know specifics soon.
 
Last edited:
That was @Nuage420 Here is the post: Low-Wattage Tubesters Official Club

I believe he sold that amp (Mk1), and then had sellers remorse and bought another one (Mk).
I would buy that first one back if I knew who had it. I did buy another but a UK built this time but haven't sent it to Sushi to be modded yet, it's currently sitting at my brother's in his home studio. I'm going there in January and likely bringing it back with me.

Edit!!! Hahaha that's right you have it!
 
Here's a pic of my new (to me) LB30 So the HIGH - LOW input order seems correct, and the main controls are MIDDLE / BASS / TREBLE / VOLUME with corresponding MID SHIFT / BASS SHIFT / BRIGHT / MUTE switches. I'll have more pics and details soon.

upload_2023-10-18_17-48-44.jpeg
 
Here's a pic of my new (to me) LB30 So the HIGH - LOW input order seems correct, and the main controls are MIDDLE / BASS / TREBLE / VOLUME with corresponding MID SHIFT / BASS SHIFT / BRIGHT / MUTE switches. I'll have more pics and details soon.

View attachment 5223957
@JIO if I recall I retubed it with a NOS Telefunken matched quartet about 5 years ago….
95E849BD-77DD-4F52-9AD8-1F7BDF1AAFE3.jpeg

3E1F4307-1EAA-41B4-AE31-9FD1EC0A5A2F.jpeg
 
@Wasnex had one modded with a dummy load, very clean mod.

Interesting, thanks!:thumbsup:

I already have a nice home recording setup with a Fryette Power Station AND a Grossman Iso Box. With these combined I can crank a Plexi with hardly any sound in the room whasoever. I don't even have to go nuts with the attenuation on the Power Station. Just a little bit of attenuation and let the Iso Box take care of the rest. The Grossman iso cab works surprisingly well for bass too, to the point where it almost feels like it defies the laws of physics.:laugh: I actually get better guitar/bass recordings in my home studio now than in my proper recording studio.:woot:

A built in load box would be a LOT more convenient though, at least when I'm only recording the DI output, with no mic'ed cab.

But sometimes I want both and I can't see a way around the OTHER "problem" with the LB's DI output, that the tone controls affect the DI output. This isn't ideal if I want to combine a mic'ed signal with the DI signal. I definitely don't want the same eq on those. The solution is to eq the mic/DI separately downstream of course but still... It's always better to get things right at the source. That's the price I have to pay for that glorious DI out tone I guess. It definitely wouldn't sound the same if the DI output was pre-tone stack (and therefore also pre output tubes/transformer).
 
Interesting, thanks!:thumbsup:

I already have a nice home recording setup with a Fryette Power Station AND a Grossman Iso Box. With these combined I can crank a Plexi with hardly any sound in the room whasoever. I don't even have to go nuts with the attenuation on the Power Station. Just a little bit of attenuation and let the Iso Box take care of the rest. The Grossman iso cab works surprisingly well for bass too, to the point where it almost feels like it defies the laws of physics.:laugh: I actually get better guitar/bass recordings in my home studio now than in my proper recording studio.:woot:

A built in load box would be a LOT more convenient though, at least when I'm only recording the DI output, with no mic'ed cab.

But sometimes I want both and I can't see a way around the OTHER "problem" with the LB's DI output, that the tone controls affect the DI output. This isn't ideal if I want to combine a mic'ed signal with the DI signal. I definitely don't want the same eq on those. The solution is to eq the mic/DI separately downstream of course but still... It's always better to get things right at the source. That's the price I have to pay for that glorious DI out tone I guess. It definitely wouldn't sound the same if the DI output was pre-tone stack (and therefore also pre output tubes/transformer).

Just realized that the latest version of the Ashdown CTM-15 also has a built-in power soak, so that might be worth looking into.

 
Just finished first practice with the CTM 30 and made direct comparisons with the Elf. What a great little amp ! If the DI sounds anything like the amplified sound I will be very satisfied! Although not set loud (semi acoustic practice) way more bottom than the ELF with bass fully dimed. As handy as the elf is it’s the backup shelf for this little elf ….
 
  • Like
Reactions: Wasnex and JIO
Just received the LB30 - learned it is actually NOS, original tagger still attached. :woot: (I unraveled it instead of cutting it for prominence-sake ;)) It's been in a music store in Santa Cruz since new, of which the proprietor Dave was an Ashdown dealer.

upload_2023-10-19_15-55-57.jpeg

Speaking of which.., was it made in 2010? (based on the serial #?)
upload_2023-10-19_16-9-35.jpeg

I peeked in after removing the top vent ... I'm going to take an educated guess that removing the corner bumpers will let me remove the interior from the case. Let me know. :)
upload_2023-10-19_16-10-51.jpeg

In anticipation I ordered a custom cover for it - it fit "like a glove".
upload_2023-10-19_16-15-34.jpeg