• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Light stiff vs. heavy flexible

Jul 8, 2017
2,914
3,642
Beijing
Comparing my Rotosound RS77M on a short scale vs. Alice A648 stainless on a long scale:

Tension: the Rotosound is obviously lighter than the Alice, being smaller gauge and shorter scale.

Left hand: the Alice is surprisingly easier to press. Could be the flexibility, or the higher tension leading to lower buzz-free action?

Right hand: I prefer the Rotosound feel, but mainly because it's flatwound. The Alice has a rather coarse outer wrap, maybe it makes for a small core ie flexibility?

Intonation: the Rotosound E string gets a bit chorusey, could be stiffness plus short scale? The Alice keeps in tune very well.

Balance: the Rotosound is breaking in and becoming balanced, I remember the tubby E when new while the A string was too bright. The Alice has relatively tubby E and A, similar to other "flexible rounds" I've tried such as La Bella Rx (but not quite that bad).

Tone: the Rotosound is darker, more focussed, thumpier, twangier etc. being flatwounds. I like how it has the "heated" harmonics similar to an electric guitar, especially when slightly overdriven. The Alice is ultra bright and responsive, if a bit scooped compared with the former Roto 66s on that bass (which also had better string balance, but were tight and not exactly smooth).

Conclusion: both light tension and more flexibility will help with playability. Tone-wise more flexibility may lead to a scooped bright sensitivity, while a thicker core gives more present mids, defined attack and better low strings (to a point).
Future plan: my light Dean Markleys (reissue) will arrive soon, and I'll try it on a bass that normally feels stiff to play. I wonder if their graduated winding approach will help with string balance and smooth feel?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Solipsistik
Conclusion: both light tension and more flexibility will help with playability. Tone-wise more flexibility may lead to a scooped bright sensitivity, while a thicker core gives more present mids, defined attack and better low strings (to a point).
I would say this is a fair assessment.

My 69-yr-old left hand doesn't like anything too stiff for fretting, but my right hand needs a degree of firmness as I hate strings that get too bouncy under the plucking fingers.

My years of string experiments have led me to hex-core strings in light gauges (40-100/40-95) set up with a medium-low action as my sweet spot.

Just a few examples...

GHS Pressurewound 40-96.
GHS Boomers 40-95.
SIT Power Wound Nickels 40-100.
Ernie Ball Group IV (40-95) Flats.
 
I found balancing myself with how the bass reacts to certain strings is usually the sweet spot. I went down in gauges for stiffer strings and found some good combinations that set up great on the bass and sounded great. Playing I’m not that string sensitive but to my ears there’s always going to be a few that stand out from the rest or at least I seem to get the most out of.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Iristone
1783319837841.png


Hahaha ..... OP seriously believe the Alice tension ....
 
To me, it's the bass that chooses the strings.

I've never (knowingly) played Alice strings as I've never been to Wonderland, but Roto flats are generally pretty stiff IMO. They do sound magnificent when other people play them, as far as I'm concerned.

My preference for strings is on the heavier side, regardless of stiffness and low action is a must.

Sometime in the near future I'll have to try the Dogal Hellborg rounds and may find myself eating my words if they end up behaving the way I believe they will, but for now...it's what I've written above.

Experiment and enjoy.
 

Latest posts