• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

LOUD..going...going....GONE

Status
Not open for further replies.
Count me as one of the MANY. 18 month lead times are just unacceptable for a company who only offers a couple of bass models and a handful of colors.

Except they are flourishing while many other companies are closing up shop. Tough to dispute their business practices in this economic climate. If you want a 4003 with standard Ric colors they are available pretty readily. Yes 4004s etc are harder to find and might have lead times but IMO it is a myth that if you want a Ric 4003 you will have to wait 18 months.

Now back to our regularily scheduled program.......

I think one of the underlying currents that I have read on TB about Ampeg is that most people believe that out-sourcing manufacturing to Asia was a HUGE mistake. I don't know if that is fact but there sure seems to be a lot of people upset about that move.
 
I think one of the underlying currents that I have read on TB about Ampeg is that most people believe that out-sourcing manufacturing to Asia was a HUGE mistake. I don't know if that is fact but there sure seems to be a lot of people upset about that move.

Even if there was no actual decline in the quality of the product the buying public seems to think there was. Real or imagined, the perception is there.
 
I think one of the underlying currents that I have read on TB about Ampeg is that most people believe that out-sourcing manufacturing to Asia was a HUGE mistake. I don't know if that is fact but there sure seems to be a lot of people upset about that move.[/QUOTE]



Actually, country of origin has much less to do with product quality than one might suspect. It can be more about constant "re-engineering" for cost reductions that causes contract manufacturer's to cut corners and cheapen the product.

The factories LOUD is using can produce great quality products or junk. It is all in the price you are willing to pay and the quality standards you are willing to accept.

In addition, the price you charge in the market has to bear some relation to costs.

When the AC30 from China came out it was half the price of the one out of England. People got that... and thought it was fair.

Not always the same situation for the Ampeg gear. In many cases, prices actually went up when costs should have declined dramatically. A basic sense of fairness makes some people feel ripped-off.

The bottom line: brands must provide value to consumers.
 
Even if there was no actual decline in the quality of the product the buying public seems to think there was. Real or imagined, the perception is there.
In this case, though, it was real. LOUD moved, outsourced all the parts with Chinese parts, cut corners where they shouldn't have, then rushed the entire product line to market and burned us (and shot themselves in the foot) with an inordinate amount of returns and exchanges. People would have gotten over the move if the quality had been there. It wasn't.
 
Agreed, there is nothing inherently bad about a company going private. But they're not 'going private' as most financial analysts would prefer. They were in the process of being delisted - a forced move by them not being able (or refusing) to meet NASDAQ requirements. Spin from the press release notwithstanding, this is a very bad thing. The end result is that current shareholders (who ever is left) find that they can't liquidate their stock, its indicative of poor conditions in the business, and it probably means that their suppliers will think twice about the terms in which they're paid when shipping things to LOUD to be made into amplifiers, etc.

I know that if I was their supplier, I would want to be paid up front as of now, not on credit. Not knowing what their current capital structure or balance sheet looks like, I suspect this will translate into big problems.

I rather like this analysis. It looks like an accurate picture to me. I'd suspect LOUD may have a fairly poor credit rating which will make capital costs very expensive and all credit hard to get, if not impossible.

At the other end of the line, many consumers are also finding it difficult to obtain sufficient credit for purchasing discretionary items like new amps, thus furthering the squeeze on sales.

It's pretty darn hard to operate in a situation like that.
 
In this case, though, it was real. LOUD moved, outsourced all the parts with Chinese parts, cut corners where they shouldn't have, then rushed the entire product line to market and burned us (and shot themselves in the foot) with an inordinate amount of returns and exchanges. People would have gotten over the move if the quality had been there. It wasn't.

Don't forget to include cutting off their customer service. Gotta have that if you want happy customers.
 
Count me as one of the MANY. 18 month lead times are just unacceptable for a company who only offers a couple of bass models in a handful of colors.

Perhaps. However, what happens when a company (RIC for instance) succumbs to "pressure" and begins mass marketing their products? All this talk about wait times for the gear - I don't get it. I have played Ric since 1969 and have NEVER waited to purchase one of their basses......

Am I a "superstar"?? Of course not. However, if I'm told that this guy doesn't have what I want in stock, I go to where someone can help me. Once that meant visiting the devil himself - Ed Roman - however, I got what I wanted with a 2 day wait.

In my humble opinion, Ric has created a false sense of urgency with their guitars and basses and it has (obviously) worked to their advantage.

The opposite can be stated about LOUD.....fllod the market with products and accept a "reasonable" fail rate with many of the amps. Move production overseas and pray to god that no one notices. Well, most bass players DID notice and took it personal.

See, it's not about WHERE the products are made. It's HOW the products are made....this will be the ultimate downfall of any corporation - apathy.
 
Yeah, NAMM booths are rented out early. They probably figured they'd set up and move as many amps as they could before it's all over.

I would imagine it's the same setup as the NAB show (National Assc. of Broadcasters), as soon as your back, you rent next years floor space. Decide what received the most traffic and if can you fit it into next years display. 6 mo. later it's being fab'ed for the next convention. I hated and loved those times.
 
Yeah that was the ultimate "no-no" from my perspective. I understand in tough times that corners get cut, but for pete's sake a company should never, ever nuke the customer support network the way they did.

Which "nuking" are you referring to? The original one after the purchase, or the newer one that seems to have occurred a few months ago?

The really lousy one was #1, where the entire support for Ampeg and Crate, etc, was trashed as worthless and redundant by the Sun Capital "minders" at Loud (At that time, just Jason Niemark and another guy).

Along that line, at the present time, the board includes no less than SIX Sun Capital folks... Thomas V. Taylor, Mark E. Kuchenrither, Kevin Calhoun, Clarence E. ("Bud") Terry, Lynn Skillen, and Jason Neimark. There are three outsiders, plus the CEO, also on the board.

Is there any question as to who or what is running the show?
 
Along that line, at the present time, the board includes no less than SIX Sun Capital folks... Thomas V. Taylor, Mark E. Kuchenrither, Kevin Calhoun, Clarence E. ("Bud") Terry, Lynn Skillen, and Jason Neimark. There are three outsiders, plus the CEO, also on the board.

Is there any question as to who or what is running the show?


My God, they all donated to Romney. :)


it's true.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.