I'm considering dropping the high C from my 6 string, in exchange for a low F#. I'm wondering if anybody has some reccomendations for who to go with for a decent F# string.
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
there are some (few) options around but your best bet is, Circle K strings.
another thing is that for this thick strings in almost certain that you will have to modify your nut for the string to fit in and also possibly (but not necessarily)the hole in your tuner too.
looks like Mr_Music90 was faster to mention them![]()
neither do i but here is another option:
Warwick Black Label Stainless Steel Dark Lord
Going from B-C to F#-G should with a .175 F# string should result in very little tension changes on the neck. Maybe even slightly less tension.That's what I mean by fitting lol. they're fitting within the slots, and sitting where they should.
I should note that this is a Warwick. So I can adjust the height of the just-a-nut. So far I haven't had to, though I can see how that may change with the added tension of the F# string.
You want the .165 for F# the .150 will be too loose.
Warwick 2 piece bridge? You might have trouble with Circle Ks as they have a short taper of 1.625" Link Removed. However some people are using CKs on 2 piece bridge Warwicks, i don't know how they made them work. A shame for you since i consider them the best subcontra strings available. Another option is SIT / Snakeskins from Conklin [Invalid or Expired Link Removed], these probably have a longer exposed core which should work well with a Warwick 2 piece bridge (but contact them to check). You want the .165 for F# the .150 will be too loose.