I think he meant to say, "carved" (as opposed to bent). That one is controversial...there has been a lot of experimentation with bent wood, showing that it has less damping, greater "Q", whatever that really is...maybe the jury is still out on that.
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
anhmytran said:Yes. It is controversial. It depends on what you believe.
I believe that wood is easier to split between the grain, and the sound travels along the grain is easier than accross the grain. I do not say quartersawn wood sounds better than slabcut wood. I do believe that quartersawn wood make string instruments with better sound than slabcut wood. How a piece of wood sounds depends on how we make it sound. I do not think about which wood sounds better. I only think about which wood makes violin with better sound.
When a face or a back is caved from a wedge, the center is not in the same grain with the edge. So, it vibrates freely from the edge.
If the above hypothsis is true, the wedge can be obtained by cutting the log accross its length (accross the grain) rather than splitting the log along the grain. When the face or the back is caved from this kind of wedge, the center of the face or the back can vibrate more freely from the edge.
KSB - Ken Smith said:My old 18th century Italian bass was Vertical quarted grain in the top. The 1800s solo Bass I just let go was also Straight grained. I think your comment is way off on this. Of all the schools of making, you WILL see more slab topped Italian Basses than any other school but NOT All tops are slab cut by any means.